# Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance {#article-title-2}
Effective protection of public health requires direction from the information provided by disease surveillance1—for example, in the cases of AIDS and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance data led to action that protected health. 2 3 Health surveillance relies entirely on prompt and accurate reporting of the occurrence of disease by doctors and other health professionals.1 Recently there has been increased concern in the United Kingdom about the need to maintain the confidentiality of information arising from consultations between doctor and patient. Documents have been issued regulating or advising on transfer of patient data. Some have argued that, unless needed for direct patient care, data should not be transferred to third parties without patients' explicit consent, or, alternatively, that all identifying information must first be removed.4 The difficulty in countering these arguments arises partly from the fact that health surveillance, including that for communicable diseases, has been neglected in official guidance on confidentiality.5 We and our colleagues are concerned that if some interpretations of this guidance were enforced they would impair or stop important surveillance activities and thus seriously prejudice public health.
#### Summary points
In the light of recent guidelines some doctors have been advised not to share health data that could potentially identify patients without either obtaining the patients'explicit consent or totally anonymising the data
These interpretations, if widely held and enforced, would compromise many surveillance activities essential for protection of the health of individuals and the public overall
The public should be made aware of the important ways in which information about individual patients is used to protect health
Those responsible for framing guidelines on the handling of clinical data and for advising doctors should consider issues related to health surveillance so that public health is not put at risk
Data derived from patient consultations, investigations, and …
[1]
J. Yudkin,et al.
Developing a district diabetic register.
,
1992,
BMJ.
[2]
R Anderson.
Undermining data privacy in health information
,
2001,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[3]
B. Hewson.
Why the human rights act matters to doctors
,
2000,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[4]
L. Melton,et al.
The threat to medical-records research.
,
1997,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
Julian Peto.
Research and privacy
,
2001
.
[6]
I. Paterson.
Consent to cancer registrationan unnecessary burden
,
2001,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[7]
C Warlow,et al.
Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit
,
2000,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[8]
A D LANGMUIR,et al.
The surveillance of communicable diseases of national importance.
,
1963,
The New England journal of medicine.
[9]
V. Berridge.
Aids in the U.K.: The Making of Policy, 1981-1994
,
1997
.
[10]
Daniel M Fox,et al.
AIDS in the UK: the making of policy, 1981–1994
,
1997,
Medical History.
[11]
A. Nicoll,et al.
Public Health Outputs from the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit and Similar Clinician-based Systems
,
2000,
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[12]
L. Melton,et al.
Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research.
,
1999,
Mayo Clinic proceedings.