Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study.

Many models of speech production assume that one cannot begin to articulate a word before all its segmental units are inserted into the articulatory plan. Moreover, some of these models assume that segments are serially inserted from left to right. As a consequence, latencies to name words should increase with word length. In a series of five experiments, however, we showed that the time to name a picture or retrieve a word associated with a symbol is not affected by the length of the word. Experiments 1 and 2 used French materials and participants, while Experiments 3, 4 and 5 were conducted with English materials and participants. These results are discussed in relation to current models of speech production, and previous reports of length effects are reevaluated in light of these findings. We conclude that if words are encoded serially, then articulation can start before an entire phonological word has been encoded.

[1]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .

[2]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[4]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[5]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[6]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[7]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[8]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[9]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Literacy training and speech segmentation , 1986, Cognition.

[10]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[11]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  The syllable's role in speech segmentation , 1981 .

[12]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production , 1994 .

[13]  W. Levelt.  Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations , 1992, Cognition.

[14]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[15]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two? , 1981 .

[16]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[17]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  The role of the syllable in speech segmentation , 1991 .

[18]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[19]  H. Schriefers.  Phonological Facilitation in the Production of Two-word Utterances , 1999 .

[20]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[21]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  Le temps de réaction verbale : I. Dénomination et lecture , 1964 .

[22]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Lexical access in speech production , 1989 .

[23]  D. Norris,et al.  A language-specific comprehension strategy , 1983, Nature.

[24]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[25]  W. Levelt.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[26]  A. Wingfield.  Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[27]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.

[28]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[29]  S. Shattuck-Hufnagel.  The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering , 1992, Cognition.

[30]  S. Lupker,et al.  Strategic Control in a Naming Task: Changing Routes or Changing Deadlines? , 1997 .

[31]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[32]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[33]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[34]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[35]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[36]  G. Stelmach.  Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[37]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[38]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[39]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[40]  L. Colombo.  Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation , 1992 .

[41]  W. Cooper,et al.  Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .

[42]  Emmanuel Dupoux.  Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish , 1992 .

[43]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? , 1979, Cognition.

[45]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[46]  Christophe Pallier,et al.  Attentional Allocation within the Syllabic Structure of Spoken Words , 1993 .

[47]  G. Gougenheim,et al.  L'élaboration du français élémentaire : étude sur l'établissement d'un vocabulaire et d'une grammaire de base , 1958 .

[48]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? , 1970 .

[49]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model , 1988 .

[50]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding , 1995 .

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data , 1981 .

[53]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[54]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[55]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[57]  G. Altmann.  Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[58]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Naming multisyllabic words. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.