Non-symbolic approximate arithmetic training improves math performance in preschoolers.

[1]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[2]  C. L. Gerstadt,et al.  The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children Article| PDF (1504 K)| View Record in Scopus| Cited by in Scopus (424) 3 1 2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test , 1994 .

[3]  P. Zelazo,et al.  An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them ☆ , 1996 .

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[5]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[6]  P. Gordon.  Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[8]  P. Starkey,et al.  Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention , 2004 .

[9]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty. , 2005 .

[10]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Number sense growth in kindergarten: a longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. , 2006, Child development.

[11]  C. Aubrey,et al.  Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence , 2006 .

[12]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  Preschool children's mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher "math talk.". , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Chaitanya Ramineni,et al.  Predicting First–Grade Math Achievement from Developmental Number Sense Trajectories , 2007 .

[14]  J. Sarama,et al.  Effects of a Preschool Mathematics Curriculum: Summative Research on the Building Blocks Project , 2007 .

[15]  G. Duncan,et al.  School readiness and later achievement. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[16]  K. Smolkowski,et al.  Preventing Early Mathematics Difficulties: The Feasibility of a Rigorous Kindergarten Mathematics Curriculum , 2008 .

[17]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. , 2008, Child development.

[19]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[20]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Early math matters: kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Michael D. Eiland,et al.  Fostering At-Risk Preschoolers' Number Sense , 2009 .

[23]  G. Burghardt,et al.  Playing Linear Number Board Games — But Not Circular Ones — Improves Low-Income Preschoolers ’ Numerical Understanding , 2009 .

[24]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  The Importance of Number Sense to Mathematics Achievement in First and Third Grades. , 2010, Learning and individual differences.

[25]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[26]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling , 2010, Cognition.

[27]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[29]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[30]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Early Numeracy Intervention Program for First-Grade Students with Mathematics Difficulties , 2011 .

[31]  Julie Sarama,et al.  Early Childhood Mathematics Intervention , 2011, Science.

[32]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Cognitive correlates of performance in advanced mathematics. , 2012, The British journal of educational psychology.

[35]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System , 2013, Psychological science.

[36]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[37]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  A Two-Minute Paper-and-Pencil Test of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Explains Variability in Primary School Children's Arithmetic Competence , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement? , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[39]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  A Number Sense Intervention for Low-Income Kindergartners at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties , 2013, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to numerosity is not a unique visuospatial psychophysical predictor of mathematical ability , 2013, Vision Research.

[42]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[43]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  Rule Out Placebo Effects The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology : Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to , 2013 .

[44]  Evelyn H. Kroesbergen,et al.  Early Numerical Development and the Role of Non-Symbolic and Symbolic Skills. , 2013 .

[45]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Adolescents’ Functional Numeracy Is Predicted by Their School Entry Number System Knowledge , 2013, PloS one.

[46]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. , 2013, Developmental science.

[47]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Children’s Arithmetic Development , 2014, Psychological science.

[48]  M. Barnes,et al.  NUMBER AND COUNTING SKILLS IN KINDERGARTEN AS PREDICTORS OF GRADE 1 MATHEMATICAL SKILLS. , 2014, Learning and individual differences.

[49]  Lisa K Fazio,et al.  Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[50]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children , 2014, Cognition.

[51]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: An investigation of underlying mechanism , 2014, Cognition.

[52]  Drew H. Bailey,et al.  State and Trait Effects on Individual Differences in Children’s Mathematical Development , 2014, Psychological science.

[53]  M. Beran,et al.  Monkey Mathematical Abilities , 2015 .

[54]  C. Agrillo.  Numerical and Arithmetic Abilities in Non-primate Species , 2015 .

[55]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Children's expectations about training the approximate number system. , 2015, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[56]  E. Brannon,et al.  How to interpret cognitive training studies: A reply to Lindskog & Winman , 2016, Cognition.

[57]  No evidence of learning in non-symbolic numerical tasks – A comment on Park and Brannon (2014) , 2016, Cognition.