Modular designs and integrating practices: Managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation

Collaboration in large-scale projects introduces challenges involving both coordination (the ability to collaborate) as well as cooperation (the willingness to do so). Existing research has shown how modular designs can improve coordination by locating interdependencies within rather than between different modules. Based on an in-depth case study of collaboration in a large-scale infrastructure project, our study highlights an effect of modularity on collaboration that previously has been overlooked. Specifically, we show that while modular designs may help overcome coordination challenges by reducing interdependencies between modules, they can in turn hamper collaboration by emphasizing specialization within modules. Therefore, though existing work typically perceives modularity and integration as opposites, we clarify how they can also act as complements. In particular, we show how firms need to complement modular designs with integrating practices that stimulate cooperation. Overall, we contribute to the literature on collaboration and modularity by explaining when and how organizations can combine modularity and integration.

[1]  Roger Miller,et al.  Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects , 2001 .

[2]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5 , 2009 .

[3]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change , 2014 .

[4]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[5]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[6]  Dan Lovallo,et al.  Delusion and Deception in Large Infrastructure Projects: Two Models for Explaining and Preventing Executive Disaster , 2009, 1303.7403.

[7]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry , 2013 .

[8]  Nuno Gil,et al.  On the value of project safeguards: Embedding real options in complex products and systems , 2007 .

[9]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Making Design Rules: A Multi-Domain Perspective , 2005 .

[10]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[11]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[12]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[13]  Nancy A. Staudenmayer,et al.  Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations , 2000 .

[14]  Bart Victor,et al.  Interdependence: An Alternative Conceptualization , 1987 .

[15]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[16]  A. James,et al.  The second face of systems integration: An empirical analysis of supply chains to complex product systems , 2018, Research Policy.

[17]  A. Davies,et al.  Systems Integration: a Core Capability of the Modern Corporation , 2022 .

[18]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[19]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  Temporary Inter‐organizational Projects , 2008 .

[20]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .

[21]  B. Looy,et al.  Do design rules facilitate or complicate architectural innovation in innovation alliance networks , 2016 .

[22]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances , 2012 .

[23]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence From the B-2 , 1999 .

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[25]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[26]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Project Complexity and Systems Integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games , 2014 .

[27]  Metehan Feridun Sorkun,et al.  Product and Organizational Modularity: A Contingent View of the Mirroring Hypothesis , 2017 .

[28]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Beyond the computer: Changing medium from digital to physical , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[29]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[30]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[31]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[32]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[33]  A. Davies Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach , 2004 .

[34]  Nuno Gil,et al.  Introduction: Infrastructure Meets Business: Building New Bridges, Mending Old Ones , 2009 .

[35]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Passing the baton? Handing over digital data from the project to operations , 2016 .

[36]  Chris Harty,et al.  Socio-material practices of design coordination: objects as plastic and partisan , 2012 .

[37]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[38]  A. Davies,et al.  Charting a path toward integrated solutions , 2006 .

[39]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[40]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Interfirm Modularity and Its Implications for Product Development , 2005 .

[41]  B. Tether,et al.  Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity , 2011 .

[42]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[43]  A. Tiwana Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[44]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  The Limits of Design and Engineering Outsourcing: Performance Integration and the Unfulfilled Promises of Modularity , 2010 .

[45]  Bart S. Vanneste,et al.  Collaboration in Strategic Alliances: Cooperation and Coordination , 2016 .

[46]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[47]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[48]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[49]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Configuring Capabilities for Integrated Solutions: Evidence from the IT Sector , 2008 .

[50]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs , 2013 .

[51]  James R Cook Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[52]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[53]  Andrew Edkins,et al.  Project capabilities for operational outcomes in inter-organisational settings: The case of London Heathrow Terminal 2 , 2018 .

[54]  Federica Ceci,et al.  Balancing Specialized and Generic Capabilities in the Provision of Integrated Solutions , 2010 .

[55]  Stephan Manning,et al.  A Modular Governance Architecture In-the-Making: How Transnational Standard-Setters Govern Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[56]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[57]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[58]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .