Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons.

Four experiments investigated the processing of hierarchical stimuli by pigeons. Using a 4 alternative divided-attention task, 4 pigeons were food-reinforced for accurately identifying letters arranged as either hierarchical global- or local-relevant stimuli or as size-matched filled stimuli. Experiment 1 found that task acquisition was faster with local-relevant than global-relevant stimuli. This difference was not due to letter size. Experiment 2 demonstrated successful transfer to a novel irrelevant letter configuration. Experiments 3 and 4 tested pigeons' responses to conflict probe stimuli composed of equally discriminable relevant letters at each level. These tests revealed that all of the pigeons showed a cognitive precedence for local information early in processing, with the pigeons using different cues to initiate the processing of global information. This local advantage contrasts with previously reported results for humans and pigeons but is similar to that reported for nonhuman primates. Alternatives attempting to reconcile these contrasting comparative results are considered.

[1]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[2]  R Kimchi,et al.  Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[4]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[6]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons , 1998 .

[8]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  A C CATANIA,et al.  ON THE VISUAL ACUITY OF THE PIGEON. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  C. Martinoya,et al.  Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. I. Tachistoscopic visual acuity as a function of distance , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[12]  R. Cook.  Acquisition and transfer of visual texture discriminations by pigeons. , 1992 .

[13]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  William D Hopkins,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  The object-line inferiority effect in pigeons , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  L. Robertson,et al.  The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  H. Zeigler,et al.  Visual field organization and peck localization in the pigeon (Columba livia) , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Thomas R. Zentall,et al.  Animal cognition : a tribute to Donald A. Riley , 1993 .

[20]  D. Navon,et al.  Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  D. A. Riley,et al.  Effects of element arrangement on the processing of compound stimuli in pigeons (Columba livia). , 1981 .

[22]  D Navon,et al.  How Many Trees Does it Take to Make a Forest? , 1983, Perception.

[23]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[24]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[25]  Michael Ventijrino,et al.  Information tradeoffs in complex stimulus structure: Local and global levels in naturalistic scenes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  John Cerella,et al.  The pigeon's analysis of pictures , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Robert G. Cook,et al.  Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination , 1996 .

[28]  H. P. Zeigier,et al.  Vision, brain, and behavior in birds. , 1994 .

[29]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. , 1999 .

[30]  Maryanne Martin.  Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[31]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[35]  William S. Maki,et al.  SHARED ATTENTION IN PIGEONS1 , 1973 .

[36]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  D. A. Riley,et al.  Spatial and configural factors in compound stimulus processing by pigeons , 1992 .

[38]  G R Grice,et al.  Forest before trees? It depends where you look , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control , 2018 .