Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase

Economists, psychologists, and marketing researchers rely on measures of consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) in estimating demand for private and public goods and in designing optimal price schedules. Existing market research techniques for measuring WTP differ in whether they provide an incentive to consumers to reveal their true WTP and in whether they simulate actual point-of-purchase contexts. The authors present an empirical comparison of several procedures for eliciting WTP that are applicable directly at the point of purchase. In particular, the authors test the applicability of Becker, DeGroot, and Marschak's (1964) well-known incentive-compatible procedure for assessing the utility of lotteries to measuring consumers' WTP. In three studies, the authors explore the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the procedure and show that it yields lower WTP estimates than do non-incentive-compatible methods such as open-ended and double-bounded contingent valuation. They show experimentally that differences in WTP estimates arise from the incentive constraint rather than the cognitive effort required in responding. They also control for strategic response behavior.

[1]  W. K. Vickery,et al.  Counter-Speculation Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[2]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[3]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[4]  P. Green,et al.  Research for Marketing Decisions. , 1967 .

[5]  Niels Blunch,et al.  Paul E. Green and Donald S. Tull: Research for Marketing Decisions . Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. ,J. 1966. , 1967 .

[6]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[7]  D. Jones,et al.  A Survey Technique to Measure Demand under Various Pricing Strategies , 1975 .

[8]  Bruce L. Stern,et al.  Research for Marketing Decisions , 1978 .

[9]  G. Urban,et al.  Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology , 1978 .

[10]  Clive W. J. Granger,et al.  Price as an Indicator of Quality: Report on an Enquiry , 1966 .

[11]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom , 1986 .

[12]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Estimating Willingness to Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-Test-Market Evaluation Procedure , 1987 .

[13]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study , 1987 .

[14]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[17]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[18]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[19]  Shlomo Kalish,et al.  A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis , 1991 .

[20]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Experimental analysis of choice , 1991 .

[21]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[22]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Procedures in Predicting Choice , 1993 .

[23]  Dale J. Menkhaus,et al.  Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef , 1993 .

[24]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Combining revealed and stated preferences data , 1994 .

[25]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[26]  Michael H. Rothkopf,et al.  Two Models of Bid-Taker Cheating in Vickrey Auctions , 1995 .

[27]  Philippe Delquié,et al.  Stated vs Implicit Willingness to Pay Under Risk , 1995 .

[28]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[29]  G. Loewenstein Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[30]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data , 1997 .

[31]  J. Lindén,et al.  Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker–Degroot–Marschak Mechanisms vs. Markets , 1997 .

[32]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice , 1998 .

[33]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[34]  Benny Moldovanu,et al.  Goethe's Second‐Price Auction , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  I. Simonson,et al.  Price–Quality Trade-Offs in Choice Versus Matching: New Insights Into the Prominence Effect , 1998 .

[36]  D. Ariely,et al.  Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers , 2000 .

[37]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[38]  D. Prelec,et al.  Always Leave Home Without It: A Further Investigation of the Credit-Card Effect on Willingness to Pay , 2001 .

[39]  Jørgen Drud Hansen,et al.  Price as Indicator for Quality ? , 2022 .