Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Vancouver B2 Fracture Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. A Multicenter Cohort Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To determine whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures can lead to successful fracture healing in selected patients, when attention is given to the surgical exposure and the creation of a balanced extramedullary construct. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Two Level-1 trauma centers in Germany and United Kingdom. Methods: Patients with a B2 fracture receiving solely ORIF using a polyaxial locking plate were included for analysis. Patients with other fracture types, or treated with other methods, or with follow-up less than 12 months were excluded. Clinical characteristics, including the Charlson index, the American Society for Anesthesiologists score, and their preinjury functional levels, were recorded. Main outcome measures were 1-year mortality, revision rate, and radiological healing according to the Beals–Tower criteria. Results: A total of 32 patients (mean age ,79 ± 12 years) were enrolled. Six patients died within the first year (1-year mortality: 19%), and 5 were unavailable for follow-up studies. The remaining 21 patients had a mean follow-up of 30 months. Of 21, 20 had an excellent/good result using the criteria of Beals–Tower. One patient required revision surgery due to loosening and secondary subsidence of the stem. Conclusion: ORIF can be offered to selected patients suffering from B2 fractures, especially if their functional demand is limited, and perioperative risk high for revision arthroplasty. In this challenging cohort of patients, ORIF was a safe and effective therapeutic option. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  A. Trompeter A call to arms: it's time to bear weight! , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  R. Schwarzkopf,et al.  Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  P. Campbell,et al.  Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in cemented and uncemented stems according to Vancouver classification: observation of a new fracture pattern , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[4]  A. Platz,et al.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate , 2019, Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation.

[5]  V. Pavone,et al.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment. , 2019, Injury.

[6]  Jacob T. Munro,et al.  Vancouver B2 Peri-Prosthetic Fractures in Cemented Femoral Implants can be Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Alone Without Revision. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  G. Finlayson,et al.  Outcomes and predictors of mortality following periprosthethic proximal femoral fractures. , 2019, Injury.

[8]  Matthew L. Costa,et al.  Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  B. Min,et al.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. , 2018, Injury.

[10]  M. Spina,et al.  Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate , 2018, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[11]  A. Capone,et al.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment , 2017 .

[12]  D. Grindlay,et al.  A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  B. Fink,et al.  Hip revision arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis in periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 fractures using a cementless, modular, tapered revision stem , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[14]  A. Tucker,et al.  Predictors for 1-year mortality following hip fracture: a retrospective review of 465 consecutive patients , 2017, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[15]  S. Odum,et al.  Survivorship After Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: Factors Affecting Outcome. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  T. Tiefenboeck,et al.  Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. , 2016, Injury.

[17]  B. Füchtmeier,et al.  Mid-Term Results of 121 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Increased Failure and Mortality Within but not After One Postoperative Year. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  D. Howie,et al.  Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures? , 2015, ANZ journal of surgery.

[19]  U. Aguirre,et al.  Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. , 2015, Injury.

[20]  M. McKee,et al.  Surgical Fixation of Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[21]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Morbidity and mortality in the thirty-day period following total hip arthroplasty: risk factors and incidence. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  T. Apivatthakakul,et al.  Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures with Percutaneous Cerclage Wiring for Fracture Reduction: Tips and Technique , 2014, JBJS essential surgical techniques.

[23]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Treatment Results of a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Case Series: Treatment Method for Vancouver Type B2 Fractures Can Be Customized , 2014, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[24]  Sung Ki Park,et al.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Hip Arthroplasty , 2011, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[25]  J. Meigs,et al.  Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  H. Lindahl,et al.  Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. , 2007, Injury.

[27]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  R. K. Beals,et al.  Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur: An Analysis of 93 Fractures , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  J. Gold,et al.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  C. Palmer,et al.  A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  M. Harris,et al.  Mortality Following Surgical Management of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Fractures , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.