Comparing the performance of three panels rules of blood smear review criteria on an Italian multicenter evaluation

The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic accuracy of blood smear review criteria, by means of three different panel rules, those proposed by: the International Consensus Group for Hematology [41‐ICGH rules], the Italian Survey [IS rules] and the Working Group on Hematology‐SIBioC (WGH) consensus rules (WGH rules).

[1]  G. Lippi,et al.  Validation rules for blood smear revision after automated hematological testing using Mindray CAL‐8000 , 2017, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[2]  G. Lippi,et al.  Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: CAL‐8000 vs. XN‐9000 , 2017, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[3]  C Briggs,et al.  ICSH recommendations for the standardization of nomenclature and grading of peripheral blood cell morphological features , 2015, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[4]  C Briggs,et al.  ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting , 2014, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[5]  B. Cantinieaux,et al.  Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000. , 2013, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  J. Ford,et al.  Red blood cell morphology , 2013, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[7]  Stefan W Krause,et al.  Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples. , 2013, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  B. Pratumvinit,et al.  Validation and optimization of criteria for manual smear review following automated blood cell analysis in a large university hospital. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  Gene Gulati,et al.  Purpose and Criteria for Blood Smear Scan, Blood Smear Examination, and Blood Smear Review , 2012, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[10]  Saeam Shin,et al.  Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  M. Hur,et al.  Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE‐2100 and ABX Pentra DX120 , 2011, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[12]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  T. George,et al.  Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  W. Shou,et al.  Development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following four different series of hematology analyzer in a Chinese large scale hospital. , 2010, Chinese medical journal.

[15]  Mira Barak,et al.  The rate of manual peripheral blood smear reviews in outpatients , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[16]  David A Novis,et al.  Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  C. Briggs,et al.  Quality counts: new parameters in blood cell counting , 2009, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[18]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  S H Kang,et al.  Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL‐DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE‐2100, in terms of clinical usefulness , 2007, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[20]  E. Gudgin,et al.  EntonoxTM as a sedative for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy , 2007, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[21]  M. Buttarello.  Quality specification in haematology: the automated blood cell count. , 2004, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[22]  P W Barnes,et al.  The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. , 2005, Laboratory hematology : official publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology.