Contests with three or more heterogeneous agents

We study monotone equilibrium behavior in contests with observable effort (bid) where three or more participants have distinct risk attitudes and the monetary value for the prize of each is drawn independently from a distinct distribution. These differences can either cause a player to drop out, that is always choose zero effort regardless of his valuation, or use "all-or-nothing" strategies with discontinuous effort choice. Neither complete drop-out nor discontinuous bidding with finitely many gaps is consistent with pure strategy monotone Bayesian-Nash equilibrium in a contest with either ex-ante identical players or only two distinct participants.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Putting Auction Theory to Work , 2004 .

[2]  A. Schotter,et al.  Workaholics and Drop Outs in Optimal Organizations , 2003 .

[3]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences , 2003 .

[4]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Bid Costs and Endogenous Bid Caps , 2002 .

[5]  Wolfgang Leininger,et al.  Asymmetric All-Pay Auctions with Incomplete Information: The Two-Player Case , 1996 .

[6]  Susan Athey,et al.  Single Crossing Properties and the Existence of Pure Strategy Equilibria in Games of Incomplete Information , 1997 .

[7]  Michael R. Baye,et al.  The all-pay auction with complete information , 1990 .

[8]  Gadi Fibich,et al.  All-pay auctions with risk-averse players , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[9]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  Uniqueness and Existence of Equilibrium in Auctions with a Reserve Price , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[10]  Ron Siegel,et al.  All-Pay Contests , 2009 .

[11]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[12]  E. Maskin,et al.  Equilibrium in Sealed High Bid Auctions , 2000 .

[13]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Charles Noussair,et al.  Behavior in all-pay auctions with incomplete information , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Bernard Lebrun,et al.  First Price Auctions in the Asymmetric N Bidder Case , 1999 .

[16]  E. Maskin Asymmetric Auctions , 2007 .

[17]  Oliver Kirchkamp,et al.  Less fighting than expected: experiments with wars of attrition and all-pay auctions , 2008 .

[18]  J. Riley,et al.  Politically Contestable Rents And Transfers , 1989 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[21]  Michael R. Baye,et al.  Rigging the Lobbying Process: An Application of the All-Pay Auction , 1993 .

[22]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  Asymmetric Tournaments, Equal Opportunity Laws, and Affirmative Action: Some Experimental Results , 1992 .

[23]  J. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of the War of Attrition and the All-Pay Auction , 1997 .