Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development

Teaching reform in higher education has frequently been informed by investigations into conceptions of learning held by students and by teachers. Such work has been extended into research education, with the study of experienced researchers' conceptions of research providing a basis for enquiry into the way research is experienced by the various participants in research education. This paper reports research designed to investigate research supervisors' conceptions of research as they were produced in focus group conversations. Using techniques of membership categorisation analysis, discourses are identified that privileged university‐based research and researchers over other forms of research and other ways of knowing, in particular over the interests of professional/practitioner researchers and over the legitimacy of research conducted in workplaces outside the university. It is argued that such discourses have the potential to be problematic for professional and industry‐based practitioner researchers ...

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  M. Foucault.  The History of Sexuality , 1976 .

[3]  G. Button.  Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Contributors , 1991 .

[4]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[5]  Gerard Delanty,et al.  The University in the Knowledge Society , 2001 .

[6]  Ursula Lucas,et al.  Achieving Empathy and Engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research , 2000 .

[7]  S. Clegg.  Knowing through reflective practice in higher education , 2000 .

[8]  D. Silverman.  Qualitative research : theory, method and practice , 2004 .

[9]  P. Thomson,et al.  Uneasy alliances: University, workplace, industry and profession in the education doctorate , 2002 .

[10]  Gerard Delanty.  Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society , 2001 .

[11]  L. Jayyusi.  Categorization and the Moral Order , 1984 .

[12]  Locating culture in action: Membership categorisation in texts and talk , 2000 .

[13]  Lena Jayyusi,et al.  Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Values and moral judgement: communicative praxis as moral order , 1991 .

[14]  S. Fisher,et al.  Discourse and Institutional Authority: Medicine, Education, and Law , 1986 .

[15]  V. Voloshinov.  Marxism and the philosophy of language , 1973 .

[16]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[17]  A. Brew.  Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[18]  Margot Pearson,et al.  Research Training and Supervision Development , 2002 .

[19]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis , 1999 .

[20]  G. Wisker,et al.  Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision , 1999 .

[21]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  The Doctoral Experience; Success and Failure in Graduate School , 1999 .

[22]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[23]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[24]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[25]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics and Literacies , 1990 .

[26]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse , 1996 .

[27]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[28]  R. McDermott,et al.  On the necessity of collusion in conversation , 1983 .

[29]  Angela Brew,et al.  The nature of research : inquiry in academic contexts , 2001 .