Nonlinear gain mediating cortical stimulus-response relations

Single isolated neurons show a nonlinear increase in likelihood of firing in response to random input, when they are biased toward threshold by steady-state depolarization. It is postulated that this property holds for neurons in the olfactory bulb, a specialized form of cortex in which the steady state is under centrifugal control. A model for this non-linearity is based on two first order differential equations that interrelate three state variables: activity density in the pulse mode p of a local population (subset) of neurons; activity density in the wave mode u (mean dendritic current); and an intervening variable m that may be thought to represent the average subthreshold value in the subset for the sodium activation factor as defined in the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. A stable steady state condition is posited at (p0, u0, m0). It is assumed that: (a) the nonlinearity is static; (b) m increases exponentially with u; (c) p approaches a maximum pm asymptotically as m increases; (d) p≧0; and (e) the steady state values of p0, u0, and m0 are linearly proportional to each other. The model is tested and evaluated with data from unit and EEG recording in the olfactory bulb of anesthetized and waking animals. It has the following properties. (a) There is a small-signal near-linear input-output range. (b) There is bilateral saturation for large input, i.e. the gain defined as dp/du approaches zero for large |u|. (c) The asymptotes for large input±u are asymmetric. (d) The range of output is variable depending on u0. (e) Most importantly, the maximal gain occurs for u>u0, so that positive (excitatory) input increases the output and also the gain in a nonlinear manner. It is concluded that large numbers of neurons in the olfactory bulb of the waking animal are maintained in a sensitive nonlinear state, that corresponds to the domain of the subthreshold local response of single axons, as it is defined by Rushton and Hodgkin.

[1]  Electric excitation of the fin nerve of sepia , 1935, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  William Albert Hugh Rushton,et al.  Initiation of the Propagated Disturbance , 1937 .

[3]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The Subthreshold Potentials in a Crustacean Nerve Fibre , 1938 .

[4]  D. Kernell,et al.  Quantitative aspects of repetitive firing of mammalian motoneurones, caused by injected currents , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A. Hodgkin The conduction of the nervous impulse , 1964 .

[6]  D. AGIN,et al.  Hodgkin-Huxley Equations: Logarithmic Relation between Membrane Current and Frequency of Repetitive Activity , 1964, Nature.

[7]  J. Cooley,et al.  Digital computer solutions for excitation and propagation of the nerve impulse. , 1966, Biophysical journal.

[8]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The frequency of nerve action potentials generated by applied currents , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  F. Dodge,et al.  On the transduction of visual, mechanical, and chemical stimuli. , 1972, The International journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Repetitive firing: dynamic behavior of sensory neurons reconciled with a quantitative model. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  W. Calvin Generation of spike trains in CNS neurons , 1975, Brain Research.

[12]  Donald O. Walter,et al.  Mass action in the nervous system , 1975 .

[13]  R. Llinás,et al.  Control of rhythmic firing in normal and axotomized cat spinal motoneurons. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W. Freeman Spatial properties of an EEG event in the olfactory bulb and cortex. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Rinzel On repetitive activity in nerve. , 1978, Federation proceedings.

[16]  C. L. Baker Nonlinear systems analysis of computer models of repetitive firing , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.