Sign-based Construction Grammar Center for the Study of Language and Information

The good news for advocates of Construction Grammar (CxG) is that language scholars from a wide array of backgrounds have adopted its fundamental insight: knowledge of language includes grammatical generalizations of varied grains. CxG, or constructionbased syntax more generally, informs models of acquisition (Tomasello 2003, Diessel and Tomasello 2000), aphasia (Gahl et al. 2000), syntactic processing (Glenberg and Kaschak 2000, Goldberg and Bencini 2005, Bencini and Valian 2008, Boyd et al. 2009), concept learning by autonomous agents (Steels and De Beule 2006) and mental simulation, the activation of neural motor programs during perception (Feldman 2006). A variety of natural-language processing projects, including the LinGO project and others in the DELPH-IN consortium use construction-based grammars for parsing, generation and profiling applications (Baldwin et al. 2004). In addition, much recent work in corpus linguistics has constructionist foundations, including exemplar-based syntax and phonology (Bybee 2001, 2007) and statistically based collocation analysis (Stefanowitsch and Gries 2005). Finally, constructions, and their adaptive and exaptive properties, have become the focus of recent work on language evolution (Jackendoff 1999, 2002).

[1]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Unification and Grammatical Theory , 1986 .

[2]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[3]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[4]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  English filler-gap constructions , 2010 .

[5]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[7]  J. Hawkins PROCESSING COMPLEXITY AND FILLER-GAP DEPENDENCIES ACROSS GRAMMARS , 1999 .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[9]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[10]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence , 2007 .

[11]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling , 2005 .

[12]  M. R. Manzini Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[13]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[15]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  There Was a Farmer Had a Dog: Syntactic Amalgams Revisited , 1988 .

[16]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Approaches to the Evolution of Language , 1999 .

[17]  Emily M. Bender Constituting Context: Null Objects in English Recipes Revisited , 1999 .

[18]  Luc Steels,et al.  Unify and Merge in Fluid Construction Grammar , 2006, EELC.

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[20]  Tomasello,et al.  The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech , 2001 .

[21]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  How hard a problem would this be to solve? , 2009, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[22]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  “What, me worry?” – ‘Mad Magazine Sentences’ Revisited , 1990 .

[23]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[24]  Judith Aissen,et al.  AGENT FOCUS and inverse in Tzotzil , 1999 .

[25]  A. Tyler COGNITIVE GRAMMAR , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[26]  Josef Ruppenhofer The Interaction of Valence and Information Structure , 2004 .

[27]  Hans C. Boas,et al.  A Constructional Approach to Resultatives , 2003 .

[28]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[29]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  From Molecule to Metaphor - A Neural Theory of Language , 2006 .

[30]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[31]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[32]  Øystein Linnebo Compositionality and Frege ’ s Context Principle , 2008 .

[33]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Linking Rule Acquisition in Novel Phrasal Constructions , 2009 .

[34]  Emily M. Bender,et al.  Constructional Effects of "Just Because ... Doesn't Mean ..." , 2001 .

[35]  Elaine J. Francis,et al.  Mismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar , 2003 .

[36]  Devyani Sharma,et al.  Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax , 2001 .

[37]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[38]  K. Lambrecht Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French , 1988 .

[39]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Condition Duplication, Paradigm Homonymy, and Transconstructional Constraints , 1991 .

[40]  Laura A. Michaelis Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion* , 2004 .

[41]  Emily M. Bender,et al.  Beauty and the Beast: What Running a Broad-coverage precision grammar over the BNC taught us about the grammar and the corpus , 2005 .

[42]  Marco Mazzoleni,et al.  Clause combining in grammar and discourse , 1990 .

[43]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[44]  E. Keenan,et al.  Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[45]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  TOWARD A CONSTRUCTION-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE FUNCTION : THE CASE OF NOMINAL EXTRAPOSITION , 1996 .

[46]  R. Jackendoff Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[48]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[49]  Christer Geisler,et al.  Infinitival relative clauses in spoken discourse , 1998, Language Variation and Change.

[50]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[51]  G. Pullum,et al.  Features: Perspectives on a key notion in Linguistics , 2010 .

[52]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: the grammaticization of subjects , 1991 .

[53]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[54]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  "Situations, Language and Logic" , 1987 .

[55]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora , 1986 .

[56]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[57]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation. , 1990 .

[58]  K. Lambrecht Topic, focus and secondary predication: The French presentational relative construction , 2002 .

[59]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[60]  FlickingerDan On building a more efficient grammar by exploiting types , 2000 .

[61]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntax and semantics of english relative clauses , 1981 .

[62]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Performance‐Compatible Competence Grammar , 2011 .

[63]  Laura A. Michaelis,et al.  Lexical subjects and the conflation strategy , 2007 .

[64]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Optimality-Theoretic Syntax , 2008 .

[65]  Exclamative constructions , 2008 .

[66]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Remarks on locality , 2007, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[67]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar , 2005 .

[68]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse structure and relative clause processing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[69]  Christopher Culy,et al.  Null objects in English recipes , 1996, Language Variation and Change.

[70]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language , 2006 .