Coupling between global dynamics and signal transduction pathways: a mechanism of allostery for chaperonin GroEL.

Despite significant efforts toward understanding the molecular basis of allosteric communication, the mechanisms by which local energetic and conformational changes cooperatively diffuse from ligand-binding sites to distal regions across the 3-dimensional structure of allosteric proteins remain to be established. Recent experimental and theoretical evidence supports the view that allosteric communication is facilitated by the intrinsic ability of the biomolecules to undergo collective changes in structure, triggered by ligand binding. Two groups of studies recently proved to provide insights into such intrinsic, structure-induced effects: elastic network models that permit us to visualize the cooperative changes in conformation that are most readily accessible near native state conditions, and information-theoretic approaches that elucidate the most efficient pathways of signal transmission favored by the overall architecture. Using a combination of these two approaches, we highlight, by way of application to the bacterial chaperonin complex GroEL-GroES, how the most cooperative modes of motion play a role in mediating the propagation of allosteric signals. A functional coupling between the global dynamics sampled under equilibrium conditions and the signal transduction pathways inherently favored by network topology appears to control allosteric effects.

[1]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[3]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES , 1993, Nature.

[4]  F. Hartl,et al.  Role of the chaperonin cofactor Hsp10 in protein folding and sorting in yeast mitochondria , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[6]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Inter-ring communication is disrupted in the GroEL mutant Arg13 --> Gly; Ala126 --> Val with known crystal structure. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Structural basis of allosteric changes in the GroEL mutant Arg197→Ala , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[9]  G. Vriend,et al.  Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints , 1997, Proteins.

[10]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[11]  A. Horwich,et al.  Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31. , 1999, Genetics.

[14]  M Karplus,et al.  A Dynamic Model for the Allosteric Mechanism of GroEL , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Building‐block approach for determining low‐frequency normal modes of macromolecules , 2000, Proteins.

[16]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The Importance of a Mobile Loop in Regulating Chaperonin/ Co-chaperonin Interaction , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[18]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[19]  Robert L. Jernigan,et al.  Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse‐grained structures , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  Neil A Ranson,et al.  The chaperonin folding machine. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations , 2002, Proteins.

[22]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[23]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[24]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155 → Ala , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  A mobile loop order–disorder transition modulates the speed of chaperonin cycling , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  Robert B Best,et al.  A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[28]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Protein Interactions and Fluctuations in a Proteomic Network using an Elastic Network Model , 2005, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[29]  M. Wall,et al.  Allostery in a coarse-grained model of protein dynamics. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[30]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Large amplitude conformational change in proteins explored with a plastic network model: adenylate kinase. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  B. Brooks,et al.  Probing the local dynamics of nucleotide-binding pocket coupled to the global dynamics: myosin versus kinesin. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies , 2005, Physical biology.

[33]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  The role of shape in determining molecular motions. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[34]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[36]  M. Wall,et al.  Quantifying allosteric effects in proteins , 2005, Proteins.

[37]  Amnon Horovitz,et al.  Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Convergent dynamics in the protease enzymatic superfamily. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface , 2006, Bioinform..

[40]  C. Chennubhotla,et al.  Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL–GroES , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[41]  C. Brooks,et al.  Symmetry, form, and shape: guiding principles for robustness in macromolecular machines. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[42]  Hassan A. Karimi,et al.  oGNM: online computation of structural dynamics using the Gaussian Network Model , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Functional modes of proteins are among the most robust. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[44]  M. Karplus,et al.  Implications of the quaternary twist allosteric model for the physiology and pathology of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  H. Saibil,et al.  Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[46]  Signal Propagation in Proteins and Relation to Equilibrium Fluctuations , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Chakra Chennubhotla,et al.  Markov Methods for Hierarchical Coarse-Graining of Large Protein Dynamics , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..

[49]  C. Chennubhotla,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  Osamu Miyashita,et al.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.