A Sociotechnical Approach to the Museum Congestion Management Problem

In this article, a sociotechnical consideration of the congestion management problem in museums is presented, by treating museums as dynamic social systems, where the momentum of the experience is controlled by visitors themselves. Visitors are considered as prospect-theoretic utility maximizers, whose behavioral risk attitudes affect not only their personal decisions and experiences but also those of others, thus creating an interdependent social system. To address the congestion problem within such a probabilistic and uncertain environment, pricing is introduced as an effective mechanism to drive visitor actions in efficient operation points, preserving museum operation stability. The corresponding problem of determining the time invested by each visitor at museum exhibits toward optimizing their obtained experience, as expressed via properly designed prospect-theoretic utility functions with pricing, is formulated and treated as a noncooperative game. The theory of S-modular games is adopted to prove existence and convergence to Nash equilibrium. Based on this framework, we study and analyze the validity and effectiveness of pricing as a tool to manage congestion in museums.

[1]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Impact of carbon taxes on the interconnected central European power system of 2030 , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[2]  David Maddison,et al.  Valuing congestion costs in the British Museum , 2001 .

[3]  X. Vives Complementarities and Games: New Developments , 2004 .

[4]  Lasse Steiner,et al.  Pay as you go: a new proposal for museum pricing , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[6]  Justin R. Sydnor Over)insuring Modest Risks , 2010 .

[7]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  The Economics of Museums , 2003 .

[8]  Shuangshuang Han,et al.  Cyber-Physical-Social Systems: The State of the Art and Perspectives , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[9]  Bo Li,et al.  Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination When the Retailer Has Different Risk Preferences , 2018, 2018 8th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS).

[10]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  Quality of Experience Under a Prospect Theoretic Perspective: A Cultural Heritage Space Use Case , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[11]  Cem U. Saraydar,et al.  Efficient power control via pricing in wireless data networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[13]  Hou Hai-yan,et al.  Empirical Study on Risk Preference of Enterprise Managers , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government.

[14]  Shreyas Sundaram,et al.  Controlling human utilization of shared resources via taxes , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[16]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.