RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA)

Abstract Purpose: Two quality controlled inter-laboratory exercises were organized within the EU project ‘Realizing the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB)’ to further optimize the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) and to identify needs for training and harmonization activities within the RENEB network. Materials and methods: The general study design included blood shipment, sample processing, analysis of chromosome aberrations and radiation dose assessment. After manual scoring of dicentric chromosomes in different cell numbers dose estimations and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were submitted by the participants. Results: The shipment of blood samples to the partners in the European Community (EU) were performed successfully. Outside the EU unacceptable delays occurred. The results of the dose estimation demonstrate a very successful classification of the blood samples in medically relevant groups. In comparison to the 1st exercise the 2nd intercomparison showed an improvement in the accuracy of dose estimations especially for the high dose point. Conclusions: In case of a large-scale radiological incident, the pooling of ressources by networks can enhance the rapid classification of individuals in medically relevant treatment groups based on the DCA. The performance of the RENEB network as a whole has clearly benefited from harmonization processes and specific training activities for the network partners.

Laurence Roy | Roberta Meschini | Analía Radl | Marina Di Giorgio | Uma Subramanian | Andrzej Wojcik | Ulrike Kulka | Ursula Oestreicher | Ruth Wilkins | Horst Romm | Christina Beinke | Omar Garcia | Eric Gregoire | C Guerrero-Carbajal | Julie Depuydt | Philip Beukes | Katalin Lumniczky | Jayne Moquet | Jelena Pajic | Michelle Ricoul | Laure Sabatier | Jacobus Slabbert | Sylwester Sommer | Antonella Testa | Anne Vral | Katalin Dobos | Natividad Sebastià | William F Blakely | Nataliya Maznyk | Daniel Samaga | İnci Güçlü | Prakash Hande | Carita Lindholm | Markus Figel | Alexandra Cucu | A. Vral | J. Moquet | M. Di Giorgio | V. Hadjidekova | M. Ricoul | L. Sabatier | O. Monteiro Gil | U. Oestreicher | R. Meschini | C. Beinke | J. Slabbert | A. Radl | L. Barrios | D. Samaga | R. Wilkins | E. Ainsbury | W. Martinez-Lopez | F. Lista | G. Terzoudi | A. Cucu | C. Lindholm | Florigio Lista | Elizabeth Ainsbury | L. Roy | W. Blakely | O. García | Leonardo Barrios | Phạm Ngọc Duy | P. Beukes | S. Sommer | M. Figel | Inmaculada Dominguez | Valeria Hadjidekova | Mercedes Moreno | Mihaela Noditi | Georgia Terzoudi | A. Testa | A. De Amicis | Andrea De Amicis | Octávia Monteiro Gil | Alegria Montoro | Demetre Zafiropoulos | Ans Baeyens | Stefania De Sanctis | E. Gregoire | H. Romm | Ana Catarina Antunes | Pham Ngoc Duy | Marco E Espinoza | Farrah N Flegal | Jennifer Lemon | Wilner Martinez-Lopez | Radia M'kacher | Monica Stuck Oliveira | Yumiko Suto | Tran Que | LusiYanti Yanti | S. de Sanctis | N. Sebastiá | A. Wójcik | U. Subramanian | A. Montoro | Y. Suto | U. Kulka | M. Noditi | C. Guerrero-Carbajal | K. Lumniczky | D. Zafiropoulos | A. Baeyens | Lusiyanti Yanti | P. Hande | T. Que | J. Pajic | N. Maznyk | K. Dobos | İ. Güçlü | F. Flegal | Julie Depuydt | M. Moreno | R. M'kacher | M. Espinoza | J. Lemon | I. Domínguez | M. Stuck Oliveira | W. Martínez-López | N. Sebastià | Farrah Flegal

[1]  Ulrike Kulka,et al.  Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay. , 2009, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[2]  Hubert Thierens,et al.  The dicentric assay in triage mode as a reliable biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents , 2012 .

[3]  David C Lloyd,et al.  WHO 1st Consultation on the Development of a Global Biodosimetry Laboratories Network for Radiation Emergencies (BioDoseNet) , 2009, Radiation research.

[4]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[5]  Philippe Voisin,et al.  Operational guidance for radiation emergency response organisations in Europe for using biodosimetric tools developed in EU MULTIBIODOSE project. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  J. C. Mateos,et al.  Investigation of the influence of calibration practices on cytogenetic laboratory performance for dose estimation , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  M. Sasaki,et al.  Dose-response relationship of lymphocyte chromosome aberrations in locally irradiated persons. , 1974, Journal of radiation research.

[8]  C. Beinke,et al.  Laboratory Intercomparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Analysis Assay , 2013, Radiation research.

[9]  A. Vral,et al.  The harmonization process to set up and maintain an operational biological and physical retrospective dosimetry network: QA QM applied to the RENEB network , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[10]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Assay for Radiation Biodosimetry in Mass Casualty Events , 2008, Radiation research.

[11]  R. Wilkins,et al.  QUICKSCAN DICENTRIC CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS FOR RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY , 2010, Health physics.

[12]  Elizabeth A Ainsbury,et al.  DOSE ESTIMATION SOFTWARE FOR RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY , 2010, Health physics.

[13]  F Trompier,et al.  Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB). , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  A. Vral,et al.  The RENEB operational basis: complement of established biodosimetric assays , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[15]  C. Woda,et al.  Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB—status quo , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Philippe Voisin,et al.  RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  J. Moquet,et al.  Web based scoring is useful for validation and harmonisation of scoring criteria within RENEB , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[18]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay: Potential Implications for Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome in Radiological Mass Casualties , 2011, Radiation research.

[19]  Leonora Marro,et al.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay - Further validation of International Networking. , 2011, Radiation measurements.

[20]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Biological Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise: An Evaluation of Triage and Routine Mode Results by Robust Methods , 2011, Radiation research.

[21]  Philippe Voisin,et al.  Why can't we find a better biological indicator of dose? , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[22]  Elisa Regalbuto,et al.  Dose Estimation Using Dicentric Chromosome Assay and Cytokinesis Block Micronucleus Assay: Comparison between Manual and Automated Scoring in Triage Mode , 2014, Health physics.

[23]  D. Lloyd,et al.  The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. , 2000, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[24]  Laurence Roy,et al.  CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.