The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles

The authors investigated at the country level the effects of four cultural orientations identified and studied by Hofstede on two commonly recognized response biases: extreme response style and acquiescent responding. Data are presented from approximately 18,000 survey questionnaires completed by employees in 19 nations on five continents (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, India, Japan, Malaysia, Portugal, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Singapore, Hong Kong, France, and Italy). Hierarchical linear modeling was employed to examine the associations between person-level response styles and country-level cultural orientations. Consistent with theoretical expectations, power distance and masculinity were found to be positively and independently associated with extreme response style. Individualism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and masculinity were each found to be negatively associated with acquiescent response behavior. Further research is needed to identify how question characteristics might interact with cultural orientations to influence response behavior.

[1]  G. Marín,et al.  Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence among Hispanics , 1992 .

[2]  S Sudman,et al.  Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. , 1997, Annals of epidemiology.

[3]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style , 1989 .

[4]  H. Herk.  Equivalence in a Cross-National Context: Methodological & Empirical Issues in Marketing Research , 2000 .

[5]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Culture and Deception in Business Negotiations: A Multilevel Analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Bart Cambré,et al.  Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items , 2003 .

[7]  Fons Trompenaars,et al.  National Culture and the Values of Organizational Employees , 1996 .

[8]  Dorothy Watson,et al.  Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale , 1992 .

[9]  James E. Burroughs,et al.  Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale , 2003 .

[10]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[11]  Peter B. Smith.  Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style , 2004 .

[12]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2022 .

[13]  K. Keniston,et al.  Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[14]  Irvine Clarke,et al.  Extreme response style in cross‐cultural research , 2001 .

[15]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Leslie G. Carr,et al.  The Srole Items and Acquiescence , 1971 .

[17]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?: , 1994 .

[18]  J. Everett,et al.  Response Styles in a Cross-Cultural Managerial Study , 1984 .

[19]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[20]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Assessment of Managers: An International Comparison , 1979 .

[21]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries , 2002 .

[22]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Simpatia as a Cultural Script of Hispanics. , 1984 .

[23]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students , 1995 .

[24]  R. Bond,et al.  Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. , 1996 .

[25]  C. Ross,et al.  Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[26]  R Niikura,et al.  Assertiveness among Japanese, Malaysian, Filipino, and U.S. white-collar workers. , 1999, The Journal of social psychology.

[27]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation , 2001 .

[28]  G. Marín,et al.  Research with Hispanic Populations , 1991 .

[29]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multistrategy Approach to Cross-Cultural Research , 1983 .

[30]  L. Cronbach.  Response Sets and Test Validity , 1946 .

[31]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling , 2000 .

[32]  Robert C. Satterwhite,et al.  The Importance of Psychological Traits: A Cross-Cultural Study , 1998 .

[33]  Hubert J. M. Hermans,et al.  Moving Cultures: The Perilous Problems of Cultural Dichotomies in a Globalizing Society. , 1998 .

[34]  R. Green,et al.  Cross-Cultural Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model , 1991 .

[35]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles , 1984 .

[36]  Debra Javeline,et al.  Response Effects in Polite Cultures: A Test of Acquiescence in Kazakhstan , 1999 .

[37]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survey measurement and process quality , 1998 .

[38]  D. Warwick,et al.  Comparative research methods , 1973 .

[39]  A. T. Church,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Response Biases in Personality Measures☆ , 1999 .

[40]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Cultural Values in Advertisements to the Chinese X-Generation--Promoting Modernity and Individualism , 2003 .

[41]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Controlling for Acquiescence Response Set in Scale Development , 1982 .

[42]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism , 1998 .

[43]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Achievement Values , 2002 .

[44]  Cynthia M. Pavett,et al.  Management Style and Productivity in Two Cultures , 1992 .

[45]  G. Hofstede.  Masculinity and Femininity: The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures , 1998 .

[46]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Response Styles in Rating Scales , 2004 .

[47]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[48]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Social Cognition and Responses to Survey Questions Among Culturally Diverse Populations , 1997 .

[49]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[50]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[51]  R. Andersen,et al.  Methodological issues in health care surveys of the Spanish heritage population. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[52]  Irvine Clarke,et al.  Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. , 2000 .

[53]  Isabella C. M. Cunningham,et al.  The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias , 1977 .

[54]  M. Zax,et al.  Cultural influences on response style: comparisons of Japanese and American college students. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[55]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .