Assessing the Effect of Batterer Program Completion on Reassault Using Propensity Scores

Recent experimental evaluations have suggested little or no effect of batterer programs on reassault but are compromised by methodological and analytical issues. This study assesses program effect using propensity score analysis with a quasi-experimental sample in an attempt to address these issues. The sample consisted of 633 batterers and their partners from three geographically dispersed batterer programs and a 15-month follow-up with their female partners. Subclassification on propensity scores was used to balance program completers and program dropouts. The propensity score was estimated as the probability of completing the batterer program conditional on observable characteristics. Direct adjustment indicates that program completion reduced the probability of reassault during the 15-month follow-up by 33% for the full sample, and by nearly 50% for the court-ordered men.

[1]  M. Selzer.  THE MICHIGAN ALCOHOLISM SCREENING TEST (MAST) , 1969 .

[2]  R. Chalk,et al.  Violence in families : assessing prevention and treatment programs , 1998 .

[3]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment. , 1985 .

[4]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .

[5]  R. D'Agostino.  Adjustment Methods: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non‐Randomized Control Group , 2005 .

[6]  J. Daly,et al.  Predictors of Dropout Among Men Who Batter: A Review of Studies With Implications for Research and Practice , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[7]  W. G. Cochran.  The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. , 1968, Biometrics.

[8]  E. Gondolf.  Characteristics of Court-Mandated Batterers in Four Cities , 1999 .

[9]  Carann Simpson Feazell.  Services for Men Who Batter: Implications for Programs and Policies. , 1984 .

[10]  J. Hastings,et al.  Recidivism Following Spouse Abuse Abatement Counseling: Treatment Program Implications , 1990, Violence and Victims.

[11]  E. Gondolf.  A Comparison of Four Batterer Intervention Systems , 1999 .

[12]  Sarah Fenstermaker Berk,et al.  What a Difference a Day Makes: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Shelters for Battered Women , 1986 .

[13]  R. Berk,et al.  The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. , 1984, American sociological review.

[14]  E. Gondolf.  Limitations of Experimental Evaluation of Batterer Programs , 2001 .

[15]  T. Millon.  Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: I & II , 1992 .

[16]  S. Hamby.  Violence in families: assessing prevention and treatment programs. , 2001, Health services research.

[17]  M. Selzer.  The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. , 1971, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  J. Babcock,et al.  The Relationship Between Treatment, Incarceration, and Recidivism of Battering: A Program Evaluation of Seattle's Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence , 1999 .

[19]  E. Gondolf,et al.  Assessing the Effect of Batterer Program Completion on Reassault: An Instrumental Variables Analysis , 2002 .

[20]  E. Gondolf,et al.  Time-Varying Risk Factors for Reassault Among Batterer Program Participants , 2001, Journal of Family Violence.

[21]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator , 1998 .

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[23]  J. Heckman.  Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations. , 1997 .

[24]  Bruce G. Taylor,et al.  Does Batterer Treatment Reduce Violence?: A Synthesis of the Literature , 1999 .

[25]  Murray A. Straus,et al.  Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. , 1979 .

[26]  D. Rubin,et al.  Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates , 2000 .

[27]  Lynette Feder,et al.  A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The broward experiment , 2002 .

[28]  Alison Snow Jones,et al.  The Cost of Batterer Programs , 2000 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[30]  D. Dutton,et al.  Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse , 1993, Violence and Victims.

[31]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Performance of Propensity-Score Matching Methods , 2001 .

[32]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[33]  E. Gondolf.  Patterns of Reassault in Batterer Programs , 1997, Violence and Victims.