Pressure‐induced periprosthetic osteolysis: A rat model

Recent animal experiments have indicated that oscillating fluid pressure at the interface of bone and implant can lead to osteolysis. However, external nonphysiologic saline solutions were used to generate the pressure in these studies. In the present study on 15 Sprague‐Dawley rats, hydrostatic pressure fluctuations were applied to bone through body fluids, by compressing a soft‐tissue membrane adjacent to the proximal tibia. A titanium plate was fixed to the bone surface. After 28 days of osseointegration of the plate, a 1‐mm‐wide gap was created between it and the cortical bone and 5 days were given for fibrous tissue to form. Load was transmitted to this soft tissue by applying force on a piston mounted in the plate. In six rats, a cyclic pressure of 0.6 MPa was then applied to this tissue by 20 cycles twice a day with a frequency of 0.17 Hz for 5 days. The remaining rats served as controls, with the piston left untouched in its upper position. All of the rats were killed 10 days after creation of the gap. Histological sections were produced at a right angle to the loaded surface, In the pressurized specimens, osteoclastic bone resorption was dramatic. In all specimens, the original cortex was almost entirely resorbed but new woven bone had formed deeper in the marrow and walled off a cystic lesion. When necrotic remnants of the cortex were still in place, new woven bone was seen on the side away from the piston. This “lee effect” may indicate that bone formation was inhibited by fluid flow away from the pressurized tissue. The specimens with a nonloaded piston showed no signs of resorption. This new experimental model shows again that a moderate rise of hydrostatic pressure at the interface of bone and implant leads to considerable bone resorption. This could be a mechanism of prosthetic loosening.

[1]  R. Marti,et al.  Fluid Pressure Causes Bone Resorption in a Rabbit Model of Prosthetic Loosening , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  D. Murray,et al.  Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  C. Howie,et al.  Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  K. Jonsson,et al.  Intracapsular pressure and loosening of hip prostheses. Preoperative measurements in 18 hips. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[5]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Periprosthetic bone resorption. Particles versus movement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Attachment of PMMA cement to bone: force measurements in rats. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[7]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis. Particles are not the only thing. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  R. Wixson,et al.  Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: a modified technique used in the diagnosis of pain. , 1983, Radiology.

[9]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[10]  L Ryd,et al.  Knee joint loading and tibial component loosening. RSA and gait analysis in 45 osteoarthritic patients before and after TKA. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Tensile bond between bone and titanium: a reappraisal of osseointegration. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.