Four-year durability of clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding CoreValve.

AIMS Long-term data on the durability of currently available transcatheter heart valves are limited. We sought to assess four-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the CoreValve prosthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS Between June 2007 and February 2014, 450 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVI in our institution. For the purposes of this study, we included only those patients undergoing successful TAVI with the CoreValve prosthesis who had a minimum follow-up of four years (n=125). Survival rates at one, two, three and four years were 83.2, 76.8, 73.6 and 66.3%, respectively. Aortic regurgitation was a common finding after the procedure, especially due to paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), which was observed in the majority of patients (71.5%), mostly mild (52.0%). Progression from mild acute PVR to moderate PVR at four-year follow-up was reported in three patients. No cases of severe PVR were observed. Prosthetic valve failure was reported in four patients (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that favourable outcomes after successful TAVI are associated with sustained clinical and functional cardiovascular benefits up to four-year follow-up. Signs of moderate prosthetic valve failure are present only in a small percentage of patients.

[1]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Usefulness of contrast injection during balloon aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a pilot study. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Anson Cheung,et al.  5-year outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Colombo,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 3-year outcomes of self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. , 2012, European heart journal.

[5]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: vascular outcomes with a fully percutaneous procedure. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Pascal Vranckx,et al.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Ronen Gurvitch,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  W. Keeling,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery , 2011 .

[10]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Tay,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Durability of Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes Beyond 3 Years in a Large Patient Cohort , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Thirty-Day Results of the SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: A European Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Edwards SAPIEN Valve , 2010, Circulation.

[13]  H. Izutani,et al.  Early aortic bioprosthetic valve deterioration in an octogenarian. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Lafaro,et al.  Immediate structural valve deterioration of 27-mm Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  G F Tyers,et al.  Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.