Concordance of transcriptional and apical benchmark dose levels for conazole-induced liver effects in mice.

The ability to anchor chemical class-based gene expression changes to phenotypic lesions and to describe these changes as a function of dose and time informs mode-of-action determinations and improves quantitative risk assessments. Previous global expression profiling identified a 330-probe cluster differentially expressed and commonly responsive to 3 hepatotumorigenic conazoles (cyproconazole, epoxiconazole, and propiconazole) at 30 days. Extended to 2 more conazoles (triadimefon and myclobutanil), the present assessment encompasses 4 tumorigenic and 1 nontumorigenic conazole. Transcriptional benchmark dose levels (BMDL(T)) were estimated for a subset of the cluster with dose-responsive behavior and a ≥ 5-fold increase or decrease in signal intensity at the highest dose. These genes primarily encompassed CAR/RXR activation, P450 metabolism, liver hypertrophy- glutathione depletion, LPS/IL-1-mediated inhibition of RXR, and NRF2-mediated oxidative stress pathways. Median BMDL(T) estimates from the subset were concordant (within a factor of 2.4) with apical benchmark doses (BMDL(A)) for increased liver weight at 30 days for the 5 conazoles. The 30-day median BMDL(T) estimates were within one-half order of magnitude of the chronic BMDLA for hepatocellular tumors. Potency differences seen in the dose-responsive transcription of certain phase II metabolism, bile acid detoxification, and lipid oxidation genes mirrored each conazole's tumorigenic potency. The 30-day BMDL(T) corresponded to tumorigenic potency on a milligram per kilogram day basis with cyproconazole > epoxiconazole > propiconazole > triadimefon > myclobutanil (nontumorigenic). These results support the utility of measuring short-term gene expression changes to inform quantitative risk assessments from long-term exposures.

[1]  A. Boobis,et al.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: A Cross-Disciplinary Mode-of-Action Based Approach to Examining Dose-Response and Thresholds , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[2]  Scott M. Auerbach,et al.  Development and evaluation of a genomic signature for the prediction and mechanistic assessment of nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens in the rat. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  A method to integrate benchmark dose estimates with genomic data to assess the functional effects of chemical exposure. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[4]  G. Church,et al.  Preferred analysis methods for Affymetrix GeneChips revealed by a wholly defined control dataset , 2005, Genome Biology.

[5]  S. Nesnow,et al.  The hepatocarcinogenic conazoles: cyproconazole, epoxiconazole, and propiconazole induce a common set of toxicological and transcriptional responses. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  C. Wolf,et al.  Human constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) support the hypertrophic but not the hyperplastic response to the murine nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens phenobarbital and chlordane in vivo. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[7]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity: case studies. , 2004, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[8]  Susan D. Hester,et al.  Transcriptional Profiles in Liver from Mice Treated with Hepatotumorigenic and Nonhepatotumorigenic Triazole Conazole Fungicides: Propiconazole, Triadimefon, and Myclobutanil , 2006, Toxicologic pathology.

[9]  Jeffrey S Gift,et al.  Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  S. Auerbach,et al.  Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[12]  B. Morio,et al.  Depressed Levels of Prostaglandin F2α in Mice Lacking Akr1b7 Increase Basal Adiposity and Predispose to Diet-Induced Obesity , 2012, Diabetes.

[13]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  H. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer,et al.  Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies. , 2008, Mutation research.

[15]  S. Kliewer,et al.  AKR1B7 Is Induced by the Farnesoid X Receptor and Metabolizes Bile Acids* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[17]  Kristina Hanspers,et al.  A system-based approach to interpret dose- and time-dependent microarray data: quantitative integration of gene ontology analysis for risk assessment. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[18]  S. Nesnow Integration of toxicological approaches with "omic" and related technologies to elucidate mechanisms of carcinogenic action: propiconazole, an example. , 2013, Cancer letters.

[19]  OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 80 GUIDANCE ON GROUPING OF CHEMICALS , 2008 .

[20]  H. Sone,et al.  Aldo-keto reductase 1 family B7 is the gene induced in response to oxidative stress in the livers of Long-Evans Cinnamon rats. , 2006, International journal of oncology.

[21]  R. Paules,et al.  Phenotypic anchoring: linking cause and effect. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  W. Xie,et al.  The Aldo-Keto Reductase Akr1b7 Gene Is a Common Transcriptional Target of Xenobiotic Receptors Pregnane X Receptor and Constitutive Androstane Receptor , 2009, Molecular Pharmacology.

[23]  Bruce C Allen,et al.  BMDExpress: a software tool for the benchmark dose analyses of genomic data , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[24]  Tanya Moore,et al.  Toxicity Profiles in Mice Treated with Hepatotumorigenic and Non-Hepatotumorigenic Triazole Conazole Fungicides: Propiconazole, Triadimefon, and Myclobutanil , 2006, Toxicologic pathology.

[25]  Tanya Moore,et al.  Discrimination of tumorigenic triazole conazoles from phenobarbital by transcriptional analyses of mouse liver gene expression. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  Weihsueh A Chiu,et al.  Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[28]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Systems biology and mode of action based risk assessment. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  Application of genomic biomarkers to predict increased lung tumor incidence in 2-year rodent cancer bioassays. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  Ord,et al.  A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes , 2013 .

[31]  Lee Bennett,et al.  Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[32]  T. Zacharewski,et al.  Automated dose-response analysis and comparative toxicogenomic evaluation of the hepatic effects elicited by TCDD, TCDF, and PCB126 in C57BL/6 mice. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[33]  Bethany R. Hannas,et al.  Genomic biomarkers of phthalate-induced male reproductive developmental toxicity: a targeted RT-PCR array approach for defining relative potency. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[34]  Jennifer Seed,et al.  Meeting The Common Needs of a More Effective and Efficient Testing and Assessment Paradigm for Chemical Risk Management , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[35]  J. W. Cameron,et al.  Dealkylation of pentoxyresorufin: a rapid and sensitive assay for measuring induction of cytochrome(s) P-450 by phenobarbital and other xenobiotics in the rat. , 1985, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.