论文信息 - Omissions, conflations, and false dichotomies: Conceptual and empirical problems with the Barbey & Sloman account. - 字舞流文

Omissions, conflations, and false dichotomies: Conceptual and empirical problems with the Barbey & Sloman account.

[1] Gary L. Brase,et al. Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2] Gary L. Brase. Which Statistical Formats Facilitate What Decisions? The Perception and Influence of Different Statistical Information Formats , 2002 .

[3] Gary L. Brase,et al. Ecological and evolutionary validity: comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning. , 2002, Psychological review.

[4] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not , 2002, Cognition.

[5] John Tooby,et al. Evolutionary psychology and the brain , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999). , 1999 .

[7] Gary L. Brase,et al. Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty , 1998 .

[8] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[9] L. Crespi. Amount of reinforcement and level of performance. , 1944 .

[10] L. Crespi. Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. , 1942 .