Studies on Substructure FMBEM and Direct Mixed-body FMBEM for Acoustic Performance Prediction of Reactive Mufflers

Due to the advantage of fast computation and drastic memory saving in solving the large-scale problems, the FMBEM has been developed rapidly in recent years. But it is hard to be employed directly to the acoustic computation of mufflers with complex structures (such as mufflers with extended inlet/outlet tubes or perforated tubes). Two approaches for FMBEM (the substructure FMBEM and the direct mixed-body FMBEM) are investigated and applied to predict the acoustic performance of mufflers in the present paper. For the substructure FMBEM, the interior acoustic domain is divided into several subdomains first, and then the FMBEM is applied to each domain. The direct mixed-body FMBEM may deal with the muffler with complex internal geometry without dividing subdomains, which is achieved by summing up all the integral equations in different zones and then adding the hypersingular integral equations at interfaces. The transmission loss of expansion chamber mufflers with extended tubes are predicted by using the two approaches and verified by the experimental data. The computational time is compared, and the computational accuracy and efficiency are discussed for the two approaches.

[1]  H. Saunders,et al.  Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[2]  Z. L. Ji,et al.  Boundary element analysis of three-pass perforated duct mufflers , 2000 .

[3]  T W Wu,et al.  A direct mixed-body boundary element method for packed silencers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A. Pierce,et al.  Variational method for computing surface acoustic pressure on vibrating bodies, applied to transversely oscillating disks , 1987 .

[5]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Muffler Performance Studies Using a Direct Mixed-Body Boundary Element Method and a Three-Point Method for Evaluating Transmission Loss , 1996 .

[6]  V. Rokhlin Rapid solution of integral equations of classical potential theory , 1985 .

[7]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  The fast multipole algorithm , 2000, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Tetsuya Sakuma,et al.  Fast multipole boundary element method for large-scale steady-state sound field analysis, Part I setup and validation , 2002 .

[9]  Ahmet Selamet,et al.  ACOUSTIC ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE OF CIRCULAR EXPANSION CHAMBERS WITH EXTENDED INLET/OUTLET , 1999 .

[10]  C. Fraser The Fast Multipole Algorithm on the Cell Broadband Engine Architecture , 2009 .

[11]  Ji Zhen-lin Fast multipole acoustic BEM and its application , 2007 .

[12]  L. Schmerr,et al.  Hypersingular Boundary Integral Equations: Some Applications in Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering , 1990 .

[13]  N. Nishimura Fast multipole accelerated boundary integral equation methods , 2002 .

[14]  V. Rokhlin Diagonal Forms of Translation Operators for the Helmholtz Equation in Three Dimensions , 1993 .

[15]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[16]  Ji Zhen-lin Acoustic attenuation performance prediction and analysis of perforated tube dissipative silencers , 2005 .

[17]  Yijun Liu,et al.  A new form of the hypersingular boundary integral equation for 3-D acoustics and its implementation with C0 boundary elements , 1999 .

[18]  T. W. Wu,et al.  Numerical modeling of acoustic radiation and scattering from thin bodies using a Cauchy principal integral equation , 1992 .