Acoustic vs. spirometric assessment of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in children.

To study wheezing as an indicator of bronchial responsiveness during methacholine challenge (MC) in children, we used computer analysis of respiratory sounds and compared wheeze measurements to routine spirometry. MC was performed in 30 symptomatic subjects (sympt), age 11 ± 3.1 years (mean ± SD), with suspected asthma and in 12 controls (contr), age 10 ± 3.4 years. Respiratory rate (RR), spirometry, arterial oxygen saturation (Sa, O2), and cough were registered until the concentration provoking a ≥ 20% fall in forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1; PC20), or the end point (8 mg/mL) was reached. For 1 min after each inhalation, sounds over the trachea and posterior right lower lobe were recorded together with calibrated airflow. Computer analysis of respiratory sounds was used for objective wheeze quantification. Wheezing was measured as its duration relative to inspiration (Tw/Ti,) and expiration (Tw/Te,). Seventeen of the sympt group developed wheezing (sympt/W) with ≥ Tw/Ti, or ≥ 5% Tw/Te Thirteen of the sympt did not wheeze (sympt/no W). Three contr developed wheeze (contr/w) while 9 did not (contr/no W). In sympt/W, RR increased from 20 ± 6.2 per min at baseline to 25 ± 9.2 (P < 0.05) at the MC concentration provoking wheeze (PCw), and SaO2, decreased from 97.4 ± 1.2% to 95.3 ± 2.4 (P < 0.05). In contr/W, RR did not change, but SaO2, decreased from 97.3 ± 1.5% to 95.7% ± 1.2% (P < 0.05). Wheezing occurred at both recording sites and was as common during inspiration as during expiration. In subjects who had both PCw and PC20, these variables correlated well (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001). Three SW did not reach PC20 (maximum fall in FEV1 8%, 12%, and 18%). On the other hand, 6 of 13 sympt/no W and 2 of 12 contr/no W had a positive MC. Thus, wheezing during MC had a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 82%. Acoustic measurements were reproducible in 14 subjects who performed a second MC within 2–10 months. We conclude that wheezing during MC in children strongly suggests airway hyperresponsiveness; however, wheeze detection cannot fully replace spirometry in bronchial provocation testing. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  K. Anderson,et al.  Variation of breath sound and airway caliber induced by histamine challenge. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[2]  R. Popp,et al.  Late pulmonary sequelae of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J B Grotberg,et al.  Critical pressures required for generation of forced expiratory wheezes. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  M. H. Williams,et al.  Relationship of wheezing to the severity of obstruction in asthma. , 1983, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  N. Thomson,et al.  Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: measurement and clinical significance. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[6]  Hans Pasterkamp,et al.  Automated Spectral Characterization of Wheezing in Asthmatic Children , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  H. Eigen,et al.  Specificity and Sensitivity of Methacholine Challenge Test in Children with Normal and Hyperreactive Airways , 1986, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[8]  E. Mitchell,et al.  The interrelationship among bronchial hyperresponsiveness, the diagnosis of asthma, and asthma symptoms. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[9]  S. Godfrey,et al.  Bronchial provocation tests in young children using tracheal auscultation. , 1988, The Journal of pediatrics.

[10]  R. Townley,et al.  Specificity and sensitivity of methacholine inhalation challenge in normal and asthmatic children. , 1984, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[11]  C. Salome,et al.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in two populations of Australian schoolchildren. I. Relation to respiratory symptoms and diagnosed asthma , 1987, Clinical allergy.

[12]  M. Ono,et al.  Relationship between forced expiratory flow and tracheal sounds. Possible effect of vortices on flow. , 1988, Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases.

[13]  S. Godfrey,et al.  Bronchial provocation determined by breath sounds compared with lung function. , 1991, Archives of disease in childhood.

[14]  R. Keller,et al.  Relations between clinical signs and lung function in bronchial asthma: how is acute bronchial obstruction reflected in dyspnoea and wheezing? , 1986, Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases.

[15]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey , 1977, Clinical allergy.

[16]  S. Godfrey,et al.  Nonspecific bronchial reactivity in asthmatic children depends on severity but not on age. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[17]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Airway hyperresponsiveness. Relevance of random population data to clinical usefulness. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[18]  J B Grotberg,et al.  Forced expiratory wheezes are a manifestation of airway flow limitation. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  R. Baughman,et al.  Quantitation of wheezing in acute asthma. , 1984, Chest.

[20]  H. Pasterkamp,et al.  Digital respirosonography. New images of lung sounds. , 1989, Chest.

[21]  J. Russell,et al.  Tannin induces endothelium-dependent contraction and relaxation of rabbit pulmonary artery. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.