Microfluidic Systems for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Advantages and Potential Applications

Microfluidic technologies have emerged as a powerful tool that can closely replicate the in-vivo physiological conditions of organ systems. Assisted reproductive technology (ART), while being able to achieve successful outcomes, still faces challenges related to technical error, efficiency, cost, and monitoring/assessment. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the uses of microfluidic devices in the culture, maintenance and study of ovarian follicle development for experimental and therapeutic applications. We discuss existing microfluidic platforms for oocyte and sperm selection and maintenance, facilitation of fertilization by in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplastimc sperm injection, and monitoring, selection and maintenance of resulting embryos. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility of future integration of these technologies onto a single platform and the limitations facing the development of these systems. In spite of these challenges, we envision that microfluidic systems will likely evolve and inevitably revolutionize both fundamental, reproductive physiology/toxicology research as well as clinically applicable ART.

[1]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  IVF within microfluidic channels requires lower total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[2]  Boyang Zhang,et al.  Organ‐On‐A‐Chip Platforms: A Convergence of Advanced Materials, Cells, and Microscale Technologies , 2018, Advanced healthcare materials.

[3]  Koji Matsuura,et al.  A microfluidic device to reduce treatment time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  R. Cortvrindt,et al.  A Reproducible Two-Step Culture System for Isolated Primary Mouse Ovarian Follicles as Single Functional Units1 , 2004, Biology of reproduction.

[5]  David B. Camarillo,et al.  Microfluidic analysis of oocyte and embryo biomechanical properties to improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies , 2017, Molecular human reproduction.

[6]  J. Smitz,et al.  In vitro follicle culture in the context of IVF. , 2018, Reproduction.

[7]  Savas Tasoglu,et al.  Microfluidics for sperm research. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[8]  Nam-Trung Nguyen,et al.  Rare cell isolation and analysis in microfluidics. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Yoshiharu Morimoto,et al.  Selection of high-potential embryos by culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  D. Yao,et al.  Microwells support high-resolution time-lapse imaging and development of preimplanted mouse embryos. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[11]  Weijia Wen,et al.  Organ-on-a-chip: recent breakthroughs and future prospects , 2020, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[12]  S. Tough,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unexplained infertility , 2006, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[13]  S. Perrin Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work , 2014, Nature.

[14]  L. Shea,et al.  Extracellular matrix functions in follicle maturation. , 2006, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[15]  L. Shea,et al.  Alginate encapsulation supports the growth and differentiation of human primordial follicles within ovarian cortical tissue , 2014, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[16]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[17]  Michael B Bracken,et al.  Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  M. Radisic,et al.  Biomaterials and Culture Systems for Development of Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip Models , 2020, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  A. Salumets,et al.  Karyotype of the blastocoel fluid demonstrates low concordance with both trophectoderm and inner cell mass. , 2018, Fertility and Sterility.

[20]  Marcos Meseguer,et al.  Full in vitro fertilization laboratory mechanization: toward robotic assisted reproduction? , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  L. Shea,et al.  Engineering the ovarian cycle using in vitro follicle culture. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[22]  Jie Qiao,et al.  In vitro fertilization on a single-oocyte positioning system integrated with motile sperm selection and early embryo development. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  E. Puscheck,et al.  Selecting the most competent sperm for assisted reproductive technologies. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  M. Hill,et al.  Optimal Oocyte Retrieval and Embryo Transfer Techniques: Where We Are and How We Got Here , 2015, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.

[25]  B. Amsden,et al.  Diffusion characteristics of calcium alginate gels. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  D J Beebe,et al.  Early mammalian embryo development depends on cumulus removal technique. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[27]  David J Beebe,et al.  Embryonic development in the mouse is enhanced via microchannel culture. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Tijani Gharbi,et al.  Measuring the mechanical behaviour of human oocytes with a very simple SU-8 micro-tool , 2008, Biomedical microdevices.

[29]  Nina Desai,et al.  Three-dimensional in vitro follicle growth: overview of culture models, biomaterials, design parameters and future directions , 2010, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[30]  Z. Nagy,et al.  Effects of different hyaluronidase concentrations and mechanical procedures for cumulus cell removal on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[31]  E. Telfer,et al.  Ovarian follicle culture: advances and challenges for human and nonhuman primates. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  J. Alderman,et al.  Development of a respirometric biochip for embryo assessment. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[33]  F. Omenetto,et al.  Bio‐microfluidics: Biomaterials and Biomimetic Designs , 2010, Advanced materials.

[34]  Yong Teng,et al.  Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture? , 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[35]  V. Nordhoff How to select immotile but viable spermatozoa on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection? An embryologist's view , 2015, Andrology.

[36]  L. Shea,et al.  Bioengineering the ovarian follicle microenvironment. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[37]  J. Harper,et al.  When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? , 2012, Human reproduction.

[38]  B. Zhang,et al.  Cumulus oophorus complexes favor physiologic selection of spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2018, Fertility and sterility.

[39]  L. Shea,et al.  Three-dimensional systems for in vitro follicular culture: overview of alginate-based matrices. , 2014, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[40]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Multi-Organs-on-Chips: Towards Long-Term Biomedical Investigations , 2019, Molecules.

[41]  S. Takayama,et al.  Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction , 2017, Molecular human reproduction.

[42]  A. Shikanov,et al.  In vitro culture methods of preantral follicles. , 2016, Theriogenology.

[43]  P. Braude,et al.  Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[44]  D. Albertini,et al.  Ovarian follicle culture systems for mammals. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  D. Beebe,et al.  Microfluidic removal of cumulus cells from Mammalian zygotes. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[46]  Todd Thorsen,et al.  Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[47]  G D Smith,et al.  Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[48]  Jing Cheng,et al.  Integration of single oocyte trapping, in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in a microwell-structured microfluidic device. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[49]  T. Hope,et al.  A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle , 2017, Nature Communications.

[50]  David Beebe,et al.  Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[51]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Microfluidic based single cell microinjection. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[52]  H. Malter,et al.  Micromanipulation in assisted reproductive technology. , 2016, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[53]  Kairong Qin,et al.  Doxorubicin-induced toxicity to 3D-cultured rat ovarian follicles on a microfluidic chip. , 2020, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[54]  D. Beebe,et al.  The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research , 2014, Nature.

[55]  Lonnie D Shea,et al.  Novel approach for the three-dimensional culture of granulosa cell-oocyte complexes. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[56]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Real time culture and analysis of embryo metabolism using a microfluidic device with deformation based actuation. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[57]  Jennifer Couzin-Frankel,et al.  When mice mislead. , 2013, Science.

[58]  L. Shea,et al.  Murine granulosa cell morphology and function are regulated by a synthetic Arg–Gly–Asp matrix , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[59]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Investigation of the material properties of alginate for the development of hydrogel repair of dura mater. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[60]  J. Sothornwit,et al.  Effect of sperm selection method by cumulus oophorus complexes and conventional sperm preparation method on sperm quality and DNA fragmentation for assisted reproduction techonology. , 2019, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[61]  L J Kricka,et al.  Micromachined analytical devices: microchips for semen testing. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[62]  A. Shikanov,et al.  The artificial ovary: current status and future perspectives. , 2016, Future oncology.

[63]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Doxorubicin Has Dose-Dependent Toxicity on Mouse Ovarian Follicle Development, Hormone Secretion, and Oocyte Maturation , 2017, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[64]  B. Lin,et al.  A Microfluidic Device for Culturing an Encapsulated Ovarian Follicle , 2017, Micromachines.

[65]  Heinz Redl,et al.  Abandon the Mouse Research Ship? Not Just Yet! , 2014, Shock.

[66]  Rui Luís Reis,et al.  Biomaterials and Microfluidics for Drug Discovery and Development. , 2020, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[67]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Assisted reproductive techniques. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[68]  Lindong Weng IVF-on-a-Chip: Recent Advances in Microfluidics Technology for In Vitro Fertilization , 2019, SLAS technology.

[69]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[70]  L. Shea,et al.  The Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Ovarian Follicle Development , 2007, Reproductive Sciences.

[71]  Julio Aleman,et al.  Design of an Adhesive Film-Based Microfluidic Device for Alginate Hydrogel-Based Cell Encapsulation , 2020, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[72]  David J Beebe,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic medium environments for culturing of pre-implantation mouse embryos. , 2002, Comparative medicine.

[73]  Bryan Woodward,et al.  Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). , 2016, Human reproduction.

[74]  S. Pérez-Cerezales,et al.  Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes , 2019, Front. Cell Dev. Biol..

[75]  E. Telfer,et al.  In Vitro Development of Ovarian Follicles , 2011, Seminars in reproductive medicine.