High-Throughput Analysis of Gene Essentiality and Sporulation in Clostridium difficile

ABSTRACT Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of antibiotic-associated intestinal infections and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Infection with C. difficile requires disruption of the intestinal microbiota, most commonly by antibiotic usage. Therapeutic intervention largely relies on a small number of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which further exacerbate intestinal dysbiosis and leave the patient acutely sensitive to reinfection. Development of novel targeted therapeutic interventions will require a detailed knowledge of essential cellular processes, which represent attractive targets, and species-specific processes, such as bacterial sporulation. Our knowledge of the genetic basis of C. difficile infection has been hampered by a lack of genetic tools, although recent developments have made some headway in addressing this limitation. Here we describe the development of a method for rapidly generating large numbers of transposon mutants in clinically important strains of C. difficile. We validated our transposon mutagenesis approach in a model strain of C. difficile and then generated a comprehensive transposon library in the highly virulent epidemic strain R20291 (027/BI/NAP1) containing more than 70,000 unique mutants. Using transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (TraDIS), we have identified a core set of 404 essential genes, required for growth in vitro. We then applied this technique to the process of sporulation, an absolute requirement for C. difficile transmission and pathogenesis, identifying 798 genes that are likely to impact spore production. The data generated in this study will form a valuable resource for the community and inform future research on this important human pathogen. IMPORTANCE Clostridium difficile is a common cause of potentially fatal intestinal infections in hospital patients, particularly those who have been treated with antibiotics. Our knowledge of this bacterium has been hampered by a lack of tools for dissecting the organism. We have developed a method to study the function of every gene in the bacterium simultaneously. Using this tool, we have identified a set of 404 genes that are required for growth of the bacteria in the laboratory. C. difficile also produces a highly resistant spore that can survive in the environment for a long time and is a requirement for transmission of the bacteria between patients. We have applied our genetic tool to identify all of the genes required for production of a spore. All of these genes represent attractive targets for new drugs to treat infection. Clostridium difficile is a common cause of potentially fatal intestinal infections in hospital patients, particularly those who have been treated with antibiotics. Our knowledge of this bacterium has been hampered by a lack of tools for dissecting the organism. We have developed a method to study the function of every gene in the bacterium simultaneously. Using this tool, we have identified a set of 404 genes that are required for growth of the bacteria in the laboratory. C. difficile also produces a highly resistant spore that can survive in the environment for a long time and is a requirement for transmission of the bacteria between patients. We have applied our genetic tool to identify all of the genes required for production of a spore. All of these genes represent attractive targets for new drugs to treat infection.

[1]  Eleftherios T. Papoutsakis,et al.  A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  Daniel J. Wilson,et al.  Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Heap,et al.  SleC Is Essential for Germination of Clostridium difficile Spores in Nutrient-Rich Medium Supplemented with the Bile Salt Taurocholate , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Biology of Clostridium difficile: implications for epidemiology and diagnosis. , 2011, Annual review of microbiology.

[5]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Cell Type-Specific Gene Transcription during Spore Formation in Clostridium difficile , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[6]  G. Dougan,et al.  Functional genomics reveals that Clostridium difficile Spo0A coordinates sporulation, virulence and metabolism , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[7]  Sheryl E. Philip,et al.  Expanding the Repertoire of Gene Tools for Precise Manipulation of the Clostridium difficile Genome: Allelic Exchange Using pyrE Alleles , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  R. Lewis,et al.  Characterization of the Sporulation Initiation Pathway of Clostridium difficile and Its Role in Toxin Production , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  E. Couture-Tosi,et al.  The Spore Differentiation Pathway in the Enteric Pathogen Clostridium difficile , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[10]  N. Fairweather,et al.  The Clostridium difficile spo0A Gene Is a Persistence and Transmission Factor , 2012, Infection and Immunity.

[11]  A. Camilli,et al.  Transposon insertion sequencing: a new tool for systems-level analysis of microorganisms , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Carlene A. Muto,et al.  Measures to control and prevent Clostridium difficile infection. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  J. Mekalanos,et al.  Systematic identification of essential genes by in vitro mariner mutagenesis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Rudner,et al.  Novel Secretion Apparatus Maintains Spore Integrity and Developmental Gene Expression in Bacillus subtilis , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Shane T. Jensen,et al.  The Program of Gene Transcription for a Single Differentiating Cell Type during Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  J. Dworkin,et al.  Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[18]  T. Clark,et al.  Use of Purified Clostridium difficile Spores To Facilitate Evaluation of Health Care Disinfection Regimens , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  D. Gerding,et al.  Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin , 2012, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[20]  Lars Barquist,et al.  Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing , 2013, RNA biology.

[21]  T. Clark,et al.  Genome-Wide Saturation Mutagenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243 Predicts Essential Genes and Novel Targets for Antimicrobial Development , 2014, mBio.

[22]  M. Churchill,et al.  A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[23]  I. Martin-Verstraete,et al.  The Key Sigma Factor of Transition Phase, SigH, Controls Sporulation, Metabolism, and Virulence Factor Expression in Clostridium difficile , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  J. Bond,et al.  Global Analysis of the Sporulation Pathway of Clostridium difficile , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[25]  Leopold Parts,et al.  Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella Typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. , 2009, Genome research.

[26]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Erin M. Conlon,et al.  The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  J. Sekiguchi,et al.  Nucleotide sequence and regulation of a new putative cell wall hydrolase gene, cwlD, which affects germination in Bacillus subtilis. , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  Alex Bateman,et al.  A comparison of dense transposon insertion libraries in the Salmonella serovars Typhi and Typhimurium , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  J. Heap,et al.  Precise Manipulation of the Clostridium difficile Chromosome Reveals a Lack of Association between the tcdC Genotype and Toxin Production , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  Regulated transcription of Clostridium difficile toxin genes , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[32]  A. McLeod,et al.  Conjugative transfer of clostridial shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium difficile through circumvention of the restriction barrier , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[33]  Margaret A. Olsen,et al.  Burden of Clostridium difficile on the Healthcare System , 2012, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[34]  U. Völker,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of temporally regulated and compartment-specific gene expression in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. , 2005, Microbiology.

[35]  J. Heap,et al.  The ClosTron: Mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined. , 2010, Journal of microbiological methods.

[36]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Genomic determinants of sporulation in Bacilli and Clostridia: towards the minimal set of sporulation-specific genes , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[37]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[38]  B. Wren,et al.  Improved Bacterial Mutagenesis by High-Frequency Allele Exchange, Demonstrated in Clostridium difficile and Streptococcus suis , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[39]  A. Shen,et al.  SpoIVA and SipL Are Clostridium difficile Spore Morphogenetic Proteins , 2013, Journal of bacteriology.

[40]  A. Shen,et al.  SpoIIID‐mediated regulation of σK function during Clostridium difficile sporulation , 2015, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  Kim Rutherford,et al.  Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation , 2000, Bioinform..

[42]  N. Fairweather,et al.  Immunization with Bacillus Spores Expressing Toxin A Peptide Repeats Protects against Infection with Clostridium difficile Strains Producing Toxins A and B , 2011, Infection and Immunity.

[43]  N. Fairweather,et al.  Transcriptional Analysis of Temporal Gene Expression in Germinating Clostridium difficile 630 Endospores , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  W. Hillen,et al.  Regulated expression of heterologous genes inBacillus subtilis using the Tn10 encodedtet regulatory elements , 1990, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[45]  R. Losick,et al.  The transcriptional profile of early to middle sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  N. Minton,et al.  A mariner-Based Transposon System for In Vivo Random Mutagenesis of Clostridium difficile , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[47]  S. Cutting,et al.  Surface Layers of Clostridium difficile Endospores , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[48]  N. Fairweather,et al.  Clostridium difficile Has Two Parallel and Essential Sec Secretion Systems* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  J. Heap,et al.  A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. , 2009, Journal of microbiological methods.

[50]  D. Vitkup,et al.  Hierarchical Evolution of the Bacterial Sporulation Network , 2010, Current Biology.

[51]  Susumu Goto,et al.  Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[52]  Mark H. Wilcox,et al.  Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[53]  H. Robertson,et al.  Factors affecting transposition of the Himar1 mariner transposon in vitro. , 1998, Genetics.