Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
Baris Turkbey | Peter A Pinto | Peter L Choyke | Maria Merino | P. Choyke | H. Parnes | M. Merino | P. Pinto | B. Wood | B. Turkbey | A. George | M. Siddiqui | T. Frye | M. Maruf | Brad Wood | Mahir Maruf | Thomas P Frye | Arvin K George | Howard L Parnes | Amichai Kilchevsky | M Minhaj Siddiqui | Michael Kongnyuy | Akhil Muthigi | Hui Han | A. Muthigi | M. Kongnyuy | A. Kilchevsky | Hui Han | M. Merino
[1] Danny Vesprini,et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] M. Roobol,et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification. , 2015, European urology.
[3] P. Choyke,et al. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer , 2013, Cancer.
[4] Baris Turkbey,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. , 2013, European urology.
[5] P. Choyke,et al. Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance. , 2015, Urologic oncology.
[6] I. Tuerk,et al. Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis. , 2008, European urology.
[7] P. Pinto,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes , 2016, Current Urology Reports.
[8] A. Billis. Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience , 2011 .
[9] G. Andriole. Active Surveillance for the Management of Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort: Dall'Era MA, Konety BR, Cowan JE, et al (Univ of California at San Francisco; et al) Cancer 112:2664-2670, 2008 § , 2012 .
[10] P. Choyke,et al. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[11] A. Villers,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. , 2015, European urology.
[12] J. Hanley,et al. Factors influencing disease progression of prostate cancer under active surveillance: a McGill University Health Center cohort , 2014, BJU international.
[13] D. Margolis,et al. Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[14] J. Epstein,et al. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[15] Shyam Natarajan,et al. Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[16] Baris Turkbey,et al. Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. , 2011, The Journal of urology.
[17] Anna Kettermann,et al. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[18] A. Sidana,et al. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[19] Baris Turkbey,et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.
[20] Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.
[21] B. Trock,et al. Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[22] Baris Turkbey,et al. Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging. , 2015, Radiology.
[23] P. Choyke,et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI‐US) fusion‐guided prostate biopsies obtained from axial and sagittal approaches , 2015, BJU international.
[24] D. Margolis,et al. Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply? , 2014, The Journal of urology.
[25] P. Pinto,et al. Optimizing Patient Population for MP-MRI and Fusion Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection , 2015, Current Urology Reports.
[26] G. Pond,et al. A prospective comparison of MRI‐US fused targeted biopsy versus systematic ultrasound‐guided biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients on active surveillance , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[27] P. Choyke,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients. , 2015, Journal of endourology.
[28] W. Lowrance,et al. Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health. , 2015, The Journal of urology.
[29] M. Cooperberg,et al. UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Active surveillance for prostate cancer : Progress and promise , 2011 .
[30] Baris Turkbey,et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology. , 2012, The Journal of urology.