Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data

Partial-volume errors (PVEs) in PET can cause incorrect estimation of radiopharmaceutical uptake in small tumors. An iterative postreconstruction method was evaluated that corrects for PVEs without a priori knowledge of tumor size or background. Methods: Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on uncorrected PET images. PVE-corrected images were produced using an iterative 3-dimensional deconvolution algorithm and a local point spread function. The VOIs were projected on the corrected image to estimate the PVE-corrected mean activity concentration. These corrected mean values were compared with uncorrected maximum and mean values. Simulated data were generated as a first test of the correction algorithm. Phantom measurements were made using 18F-FDG–filled spheres in a scattering medium. Clinical validation used 154 surrogate tumors from 9 patients. The surrogate tumors were blood-pool images of the descending aorta as well as mesenteric and iliac arteries and veins. Surrogate tumors ranged in diameter from 5 to 25 mm. Analysis used 18F-FDG and 11C-CO datasets (both dynamic and static). Values representing “truth” were derived from imaging the blood pool in large structures (e.g., the left ventricle, left atrium, or sections of the aorta) where PVEs were negligible. Surrogate tumor sizes were measured from contrast CT. Results: The PVE-correction technique, when applied to the mean value in spheric phantoms, yielded recovery coefficients of 87% for an 8-mm-diameter sphere and between 100% and 103% for spheres between 13 and 29 mm. For the human studies, PVE-corrected data recovered a large fraction of the true activity concentration (86% ± 7% for an 8-mm-diameter tumor and 98% ± 8% for tumors between 10 and 24 mm). For tumors smaller than 18 mm, the PVE-corrected mean values were less biased (P < 0.05) than the uncorrected maximum or mean values. Conclusion: Iterative postreconstruction PVE correction generated more accurate uptake measurements in subcentimeter tumors for both phantoms and patients than the uncorrected values. The method eliminates the requirement for segmenting anatomic data and estimating tumor metabolic size or tumor background level. This technique applies a PVE correction to the mean voxel value within a VOI, yielding a more accurate estimate of uptake than the maximum voxel value.

[1]  S Webb,et al.  Constrained deconvolution of SPECT liver tomograms by direct digital image restoration. , 1985, Medical physics.

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Validation of PET-acquired input functions for cardiac studies. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. Phelps,et al.  Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  S Webb,et al.  Improved quantification of radionuclide uptake using deconvolution and windowed subtraction techniques for scatter compensation in single photon emission computed tomography. , 1990, Medical physics.

[5]  T. Momose,et al.  Noninvasive method to obtain input function for measuring tissue glucose utilization of thoracic and abdominal organs. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  P. Crilly A quantitative evaluation of various iterative deconvolution algorithms , 1991 .

[7]  S C Strother,et al.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Methods for improving quantitation of putamen uptake constant of FDOPA in PET studies. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  P Suetens,et al.  Three-dimensional correction for spillover and recovery of myocardial PET images. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  A. Evans,et al.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  F. Detterbeck,et al.  Inadequacy of computed tomography in assessing patients with esophageal carcinoma after induction chemoradiotherapy , 1999, Cancer.

[12]  L. Adler,et al.  Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Max Mignotte,et al.  Three-dimensional blind deconvolution of SPECT images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Lilli Geworski,et al.  Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A A Lammertsma,et al.  Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac (18)F-FDG PET scans. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  H R Tang,et al.  Neuroblastoma imaging using a combined CT scanner-scintillation camera and 131I-MIBG. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Vincent Frouin,et al.  Correction of partial-volume effect for PET striatal imaging: fast implementation and study of robustness. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  A. Brahme,et al.  Biologically Optimized 3-Dimensional In Vivo Predictive Assay-based Radiation Therapy Using Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography Imaging , 2003, Acta oncologica.

[20]  Ingeborg Goethals,et al.  Nuclear medicine imaging to predict response to radiotherapy: a review. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Jason P Fine,et al.  Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy planning with a dedicated combined PET-CT-simulator of patients with non-small cell lung cancer on dose limiting normal tissues and radiation dose-escalation: a planning study. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Critical review of PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in lung cancer. , 2005, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[27]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Hanna El Balaa,et al.  Impact of CT and 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography image fusion for conformal radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  D Visvikis,et al.  A multiresolution image based approach for correction of partial volume effects in emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.