Variation in Approaches to Lab Practical Classes among Computing Academics

As part of a wide-ranging phenomenographic study of computing teachers, we explored their varying understandings of the lab practical class and discovered four distinct categories of description of lab practicals. We consider which of these categories appear comparable with nonlecture classes in other disciplines, and which appear distinctive to computing. An awareness of this range of approaches to conducting practical lab classes will better enable academics to consider which is best suited to their own purposes when designing courses.

[1]  Tony Jenkins,et al.  Research-led innovation in teaching and learning programming , 1999, ITiCSE '99.

[2]  H. Lehmann,et al.  Communication and information technology in medical education , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  Dennis Fox,et al.  Personal theories of teaching , 1983 .

[4]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  A new dimension to understanding university teaching , 2004 .

[5]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other , 1999 .

[6]  Chris Cope,et al.  Educationally critical aspects of a deep understanding of the concept of an information system , 2000, ACSE '00.

[7]  Asad Azemi.  Teaching computer programming courses in a computer laboratory environment , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[8]  Jo McKenzie.  Variation and relevance structures for university teachers learning: bringing about change in ways of experiencing teaching , 2002 .

[9]  Jens Kaasbøll,et al.  A survey of methods used to evaluate computer science teaching , 1998, ITiCSE '98.

[10]  Simon.  An IT degree combining the strengths of university and TAFE , 2003 .

[11]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[12]  Robert David Edmund Sewell.  Pharmacology Experimental Benefits from the Use of Computer-Assisted Learning , 1996 .

[13]  Judithe Sheard,et al.  The value of discussion classes for teaching introductory programming , 1998, ITiCSE '98.

[14]  John Leaney,et al.  First Year Programming: Let All the Flowers Bloom , 2003, ACE.

[15]  D. Bligh.  What's the Use of Lectures? , 1971 .

[16]  Anne Venables,et al.  Differing Ways that Computing Academics Understand Teaching. , 2007 .

[17]  GB Heath.  Lecturing , 1971, Veterinary Record.

[18]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Researching university teaching in Australia: Themes and issues in academics' reflections , 1999 .

[19]  Ian E. Hughes,et al.  Alternatives to Laboratory Practicals – Do They Meet the Needs? , 2001 .

[20]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[21]  Gerlese L Akerlind.  Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration , 2005 .

[22]  Anne Venables,et al.  Everything we wanted to know about our course, but were afraid to ask: views from the student’s perspective , 2006 .

[23]  Philip Taylor,et al.  A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching , 1994 .

[24]  S. Hennessy,et al.  A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning , 2002 .

[25]  Janet Carter,et al.  Teaching Delivery Issues: Lessons from Computer Science , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[26]  Cat Kutay,et al.  Up close and pedagogical: computing academics talk about teaching , 2006 .