Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects

The goal of the present research was to investigate the role of three central-executive functions—switching of mental sets, inhibition of prepotent responses, and simultaneous storage and processing (i.e., working-memory capacity)—in accounting for method variance in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). In two studies, several IATs with unrelated contents were administered along with a battery of central-executive tasks, with multiple tasks tapping each of the above executive functions. Method variance was found to be related to the switching factor, but not to the inhibition factor. There was also evidence for a small independent contribution of the working-memory capacity factor. The findings constrain process accounts of the IAT, lending support to an account in terms of task-set switching, and they have consequences for applications.

[1]  N. Meiran,et al.  Component Processes in Task Switching , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  A. Jersild.  Mental set and shift , 2011 .

[3]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[4]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[5]  Jennifer A. Richeson,et al.  When Prejudice Does Not Pay , 2003, Psychological science.

[6]  R. Wiers,et al.  Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. R. Simon.  The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Using the implicit association test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[9]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[10]  D. Balota,et al.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  7. A practical guide to implicit association tests and related tasks , 2010 .

[12]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[13]  W. von Hippel,et al.  Stereotyping Against Your Will: The Role of Inhibitory Ability in Stereotyping and Prejudice among the Elderly , 2000 .

[14]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Handbook of implicit social cognition : measurement, theory,and applications , 2010 .

[16]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[17]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Task-Set Inertia, Attitude Accessibility, and Compatibility-Order Effects: New Evidence for a Task-Set Switching Account of the Implicit Association Test Effect , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin a Threat in the Computer: the Race Implicit Association Test as a Stereotype Threat Experience , 2022 .

[19]  R. Engle.  Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[20]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[21]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What We Know (So Far) about the Method. , 2007 .

[22]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. , 2008, Psychological review.

[23]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  How to make your own response boxes: A step-by-step guide for the construction of reliable and inexpensive parallel-port response pads from computer mice , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[24]  K. Gonsalkorale,et al.  Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults , 2009 .

[25]  W. Hippel,et al.  Bias and regulation of bias in intergroup interactions: Implicit attitudes toward Muslims and interaction quality , 2009 .

[26]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  S. Monsell.  Control of mental processes , 2021, Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind.

[31]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[32]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct , 2000 .

[33]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Bertram Gawronski.  What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[36]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Martha Haskell Clark.  Tasks , 1924 .

[38]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[39]  V. Bruce.  Unsolved mysteries of the mind : tutorial essays in cognition , 1998 .

[40]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review , 2007 .

[41]  James Jaccard,et al.  Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction , 2006 .

[42]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[44]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. , 1994 .

[45]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  S. McFarland,et al.  A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND ON THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST , 2002 .

[47]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[48]  Michael Johns,et al.  Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.