Time-resolved Adaptive Direct FEM Simulation of High-lift Aircraft Configurations

We present an adaptive finite element method for time-resolved simulation of aerodynamics without any turbulence-model parameters, which is applied to a benchmark problem from the HiLiftPW-3 workshop to compute the flow past a JAXA Standard Model (JSM) aircraft model at realistic Reynolds numbers. The mesh is automatically constructed by the method as part of an adaptive algorithm based on a posteriori error estimation using adjoint techniques. No explicit turbulence model is used, and the effect of unresolved turbulent boundary layers is modeled by a simple parametrization of the wall shear stress in terms of a skin friction. In the case of very high Reynolds numbers, we approximate the small skin friction by zero skin friction, corresponding to a free-slip boundary condition, which results in a computational model without any model parameter to be tuned, and without the need for costly boundary-layer resolution. We introduce a numerical tripping-noise term to act as a seed for growth of perturbations; the results support that this triggers the correct physical separation at stall and has no significant pre-stall effect. We show that the methodology quantitavely and qualitatively captures the main features of the JSM experiment—aerodynamic forces and the stall mechanism—with a much coarser mesh resolution and lower computational cost than the state-of-the-art methods in the field, with convergence under mesh refinement by the adaptive method. Thus, the simulation methodology appears to be a possible answer to the challenge of reliably predicting turbulent-separated flows for a complete air vehicle.

[1]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  Unicorn: a unified continuum mechanics solver; in automated solution pf differential equations by the finite element method , 2011 .

[2]  Robert C. Kirby,et al.  FIAT: numerical construction of finite element basis functions , 2012 .

[3]  Anders Logg Automated solution of differential equations , 2007 .

[4]  Anders Logg,et al.  Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method: The FEniCS Book , 2012 .

[5]  Guillaume Houzeaux,et al.  A massively parallel fractional step solver for incompressible flows , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  P. Spalart Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2009 .

[7]  Li Jiang,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of flow separation around a NACA 0012 airfoil , 2005 .

[8]  Ramis Örlü,et al.  Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Jochen Fröhlich,et al.  Lessons from LESFOIL Project on Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Around an Airfoil , 2003 .

[10]  William Gropp,et al.  CFD Vision 2030 Study: A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences , 2014 .

[11]  Freddie D. Witherden,et al.  Future Directions in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2017 .

[12]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Turbulent flow and fluid–structure interaction , 2012 .

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[14]  Raducanu Razvan,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELS and METHODS in APPLIED SCIENCES , 2012 .

[15]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Computability and Adaptivity in CFD , 2007 .

[16]  P. Moin,et al.  Active Control of Flow Separation Over an Airfoil Using Synthetic Jets , 2008 .

[17]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Adaptive simulation of the subcritical flow past a sphere , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Efficient computation of mean drag for the subcritical flow past a circular cylinder using general Galerkin G2 , 2009 .

[19]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  FEniCS-HPC: Automated Predictive High-Performance Finite Element Computing with Applications in Aerodynamics , 2015, PPAM.

[20]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Computational Turbulent Incompressible Flow: Applied Mathematics: Body and Soul 4 , 2007 .

[21]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  UNIFIED CONTINUUM MODELING OF FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2011 .

[22]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  Towards a parameter-free method for high Reynolds number turbulent flow simulation based on adaptive finite element approximation , 2015 .

[23]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  Unicorn: a unified continuum mechanics solver , 2012 .

[24]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  Adaptive computation of aeroacoustic sources for a rudimentary landing gear , 2014 .

[25]  P. Sagaut Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows , 2001 .

[26]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  Unicorn Parallel adaptive finite element simulation of turbulent flow and fluid-structure interaction for deforming domains and complex geometry , 2013 .

[27]  Raymond P. LeBeau,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF BLOWING AND SUCTION CONTROL ON NACA 0012 AIRFOIL USING GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2004 .

[28]  Liang Huang,et al.  Numerical study of blowing and suction control mechanism on NACA0012 airfoil , 2004 .

[29]  Anna Gerber,et al.  Computational Turbulent Incompressible Flow Applied Mathematics Body And Soul 4 , 2016 .

[30]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Resolution of d’Alembert’s Paradox , 2010 .

[31]  Anders Logg,et al.  FFC: the FEniCS Form Compiler , 2012 .

[32]  P. Saugat Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows , 2001 .

[33]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Computation of Mean Drag for Bluff Body Problems Using Adaptive DNS/LES , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[34]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  A new approach to computational turbulence modeling , 2006 .

[35]  U. Piomelli,et al.  Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations , 2008 .

[36]  NICLAS JANSSON,et al.  Framework for Massively Parallel Adaptive Finite Element Computational Fluid Dynamics on Tetrahedral Meshes , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[37]  P. Moin,et al.  Active Control of Flow Separation Over an Airfoil Using Synthetic Jets , 2008 .

[38]  Niclas Jansson,et al.  A computational study of turbulent flow separation for a circular cylinder using skin friction boundary conditions , 2011 .