Reduction of apple tree height (Malus domestica Borkh) cv. Ultra Red Gala/MM111 does not decrease fruit yield and quality

Abstract In Chile, like in other countries, a high percentage of apple ( Malus domestica Borkh) orchards are grafted on vigorous or semi-vigorous rootstocks. The need to decrease the amount of labor involved and increase efficiency has motivated this study on the effect of reducing the height of cv. Ultra Red Gala/MM111 trees in a commercial orchard in the Maule Region of Chile. Apple trees were planted in 2003, and their tree heights were adjusted to 2.5, 3.0 and 3.6 m prior to blooming in 2006. The reduction of plant height from 3.6 m to 2.5 m determined a significant reduction in canopy volume (26% and 29% in 2007/2008 and 2008/2009, respectively), but no differences were detected in leaf area index (LAI) and the photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) transmitted through the canopy. However, a higher proportion of the canopies of the shorter trees had over 30% of incident PAR, the threshold for the production of good fruit quality and flower-bud differentiation. There were no differences in fruit production among plant heights, accumulating 131 tonnes ha −1 in the three growing seasons. Over the three seasons, the shortest plants (2.5 m) required 19, 57 and 42% less labor time at harvest, respectively, than the plants maintained at a height of 3.6 m. There were no evident differences in fruit quality among the treatments; flesh firmness varied between 73.0 and 74.0 N, soluble solids between 11.6 and 12.6°Brix, mean weight between 180 and 200 g, and the percentage of red coloring exceeded 59% of the Premium fruit in the three growing seasons. Our results suggest that it is possible to manage plants with reduced height on semi-vigorous rootstocks and thus reduce the time necessary for harvesting, without affecting fruit yield and quality.

[1]  J. Palmer The effects of row orientation, tree height, time of year and latitude on light interception and distribution in model apple hedgerow canopies , 1989 .

[2]  Terence L. Robinson,et al.  Bases of Yield and Production Efficiency in Apple Orchard Systems , 1991 .

[3]  J. Val,et al.  Prohexadione–Ca inhibits vegetative growth of ‘Smoothee Golden Delicious’ apple trees , 2004 .

[4]  T. G. Thorp,et al.  Apple dwarfing rootstocks and interstocks affect the type of growth units produced during the annual growth cycle: precocious transition to flowering affects the composition and vigour of annual shoots. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[5]  C. Trottier,et al.  Architecture and size relations: an essay on the apple (Malus x domestica, Rosaceae) tree. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[6]  G. M. Greene,et al.  A MULTI-LOCATION COMPARISON OF 'GENEVA® 16', 'GENEVA® 41' AND 'M.9' APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN NORTH AMERICA , 2007 .

[7]  John W. Palmer,et al.  Adoption and Implementation of Intensive Planting Systems for Apple - The New Zealand Experience , 2008 .

[8]  J. M. Lespinasse,et al.  APPLE TREE MANAGEMENT IN VERTICAL AXIS: APPRAISAL AFTER TEN YEARS OF EXPERIMENTS , 1986 .

[9]  I. Iglesias,et al.  Differences in fruit colour development, anthocyanin content, fruit quality and consumer acceptability of eight ‘Gala’ apple strains , 2008 .

[10]  M. Merzlyak,et al.  Effect of anthocyanins, carotenoids, and flavonols on chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra in apple fruit: signature analysis, assessment, modelling, and relevance to photoprotection. , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[11]  J. E. Jackson THEORY OF LIGHT INTERCEPTION BY ORCHARDS AND A MODELLING APPROACH TO OPTIMIZING ORCHARD DESIGN , 1981 .

[12]  J. Palmer,et al.  Annual dry-matter production by three apple cultivars at four within-row spacings in New Zealand , 2002 .

[13]  J. E. Jackson,et al.  A computer model study of light interception by orchards in relation to mechanised harvesting and management. , 1980 .

[14]  S. Wertheim,et al.  Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. , 2005 .

[15]  G. Neilsen,et al.  Nitrogen Fertigation Concentration and Timing of Application Affect Nitrogen Nutrition, Yield, Firmness, and Color of Apples Grown at High Density , 2009 .

[16]  S. Wand,et al.  Evidence for a photoprotective function of low-temperature-induced anthocyanin accumulation in apple and pear peel. , 2009, Physiologia Plantarum : An International Journal for Plant Biology.

[17]  O. Callesen,et al.  EFFECT OF TREE DENSITY, TREE HEIGHT AND RECTANGULARITY ON GROWTH, FLOWERING, AND FRUIT PRODUCTION , 1989 .

[18]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Triazoles as Plant Growth Regulators and Stress Protectants , 2000 .

[19]  P. Ernani,et al.  Addition of nitrogen had no effect on yield and quality of apples in an high density orchard carrying a dwarf rootstock , 2008 .

[20]  E. Goldschmidt,et al.  Girdling: Physiological and Horticultural Aspects , 2004 .

[21]  E. Curry Temperatures for optimum anthocyanin accumulation in apple tissue , 1997 .

[22]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  Labor requirements for 'Empire' and 'Jonagold' affected by rootstock and three orchard systems in the Michigan NC-140 trial , 1997 .

[23]  M. Saure External control of anthocyanin formation in apple , 1990 .

[24]  A. Gomand,et al.  CAN FRUIT SIZE AND COLOURING OF 'JONAGOLD' BE IMPROVED BY AN INTERSTOCK? , 2007 .

[25]  D. Greene The Effect of Repeat Annual Applications of Prohexadione–calcium on Fruit Set, Return Bloom, and Fruit Size of Apples , 2008 .

[26]  Alan N. Lakso,et al.  The Relationship Between Leaf Area and Light Interception by Spur and Extension Shoot Leaves and Apple Orchard Productivity , 2000 .