SAMPLE SIZE FOR THE ESTIMATION OF SOME SORGHUM TRAITS

Sorghum research, just like any research involving other crops, requires a knowledge of experimental techniques that will provide the maximum precision with a minimum of resources. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the implications of sampling size over the results obtained with the application of tests F and Tukey in the analysis of sorghum traits variance. Another objective was to identify ideal sample sizes for those traits, by using two methods: use of the experimental coefficient of variation value (CV) alone; use of formula involving the variance of an estimated plot mean based on a sampling units. Eight sorghum cultivars were evaluated in a random block design with four replicates. All plants in the plot (45), in addition to eight sample sizes (varying from 5 to 40 units, at 5-unit intervals) were utilized to evaluate plant height (PH), dry matter in the vegetative above-ground part of the plant (without the panicle) (DMP), length (PL), and panicle dry matter (PDM). It was observed that the F and Tukey tests, based on samples, could result in different conclusions from those obtained when all plants in the plot are utilized to evaluate DMP and PDM. About 25 units represent samples for the estimation of the four characteristics, when the CV value is used. The adoption of the sample size formula proved that to estimate PH, DMP, PL, and PDM, the ideal sample sizes would be 14 plants, 11 plants, 14 panicles, and 24 panicles, respectively.

[1]  L. Storck,et al.  Influência de cultivares, estádios e níveis de desfolhamento sobre o tamanho de amostra para avaliação de características agronômicas em soja (Glycine max (L.) MERRILL) , 2008 .

[2]  V. Parshad,et al.  Comparison of sampling methods and sample sizes for the assessment of pre- harvest rodent damage in wheat (Triticum aestivum) fields , 2001 .

[3]  R. P. Nunes,et al.  Amostragem e tamanho da amostra na estimação de caracteres da espiga do milho , 1998 .

[4]  A. Schlegel,et al.  Response of corn, grain sorghum, and sunflower to irrigation in the High Plains of Kansas☆ , 1996 .

[5]  M. Kang,et al.  Sample size for evaluating field ear moisture loss rate in maize , 1996 .

[6]  B. R. Singh,et al.  Agronomic and physiological responses of sorghum, maize and pearl millet to irrigation , 1995 .

[7]  J. Ellis,et al.  Sample Number Effect on Precision of Measurements of Rice Canopy Photosynthesis and Leaf Area , 1991 .

[8]  L. Wade,et al.  Influence of quadrat sampling intensity on precision of grain sorghum yield data , 1988 .

[9]  L. Bundy,et al.  Field plot technique comparison for estimating corn grain and dry matter yield , 1988 .

[10]  T. A. Matheny,et al.  Precision and bias of various soybean dry matter sampling techniques , 1987 .

[11]  R. Selley,et al.  Samples Needed for Estimation of Plant Height of Pima Cotton1 , 1986 .

[12]  A. G. Rossetti,et al.  A amostragem na experimentação em viveiro de seringueira , 1986 .

[13]  James H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach (2nd ed) , 1980 .

[14]  Andrew G. Clark,et al.  Field Plot Technique , 1940 .