Determining the relative importance of figures in journal articles to find representative images

When physicians are searching for articles in the medical literature, images of the articles can help determining relevance of the article content for a specific information need. The visual image representation can be an advantage in effectiveness (quality of found articles) and also in efficiency (speed of determining relevance or irrelevance) as many articles can likely be excluded much quicker by looking at a few representative images. In domains such as medical information retrieval, allowing to determine relevance quickly and accurately is an important criterion. This becomes even more important when small interfaces are used as it is frequently the case on mobile phones and tablets to access scientific data whenever information needs arise. In scientific articles many figures are used and particularly in the biomedical literature only a subset may be relevant for determining the relevance of a specific article to an information need. In many cases clinical images can be seen as more important for visual appearance than graphs or histograms that require looking at the context for interpretation. To get a clearer idea of image relevance in articles, a user test with a physician was performed who classified images of biomedical research articles into categories of importance that can subsequently be used to evaluate algorithms that automatically select images as representative examples. The manual sorting of images of 50 journal articles of BioMedCentral with each containing more than 8 figures by importance also allows to derive several rules that determine how to choose images and how to develop algorithms for choosing the most representative images of specific texts. This article describes the user tests and can be a first important step to evaluate automatic tools to select representative images for representing articles and potentially also images in other contexts, for example when representing patient records or other medical concepts when selecting images to represent RadLex terms in tutorials or interactive interfaces for example. This can help to make the image retrieval process more efficient and effective for physicians.

[1]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Exploring Text and Image Features to Classify Images in Bioscience Literature , 2006, BioNLP@NAACL-HLT.

[2]  A. Kak,et al.  Automated storage and retrieval of thin-section CT images to assist diagnosis: system description and preliminary assessment. , 2003, Radiology.

[3]  Hong Yu,et al.  Automatic Figure Ranking and User Interfacing for Intelligent Figure Search , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  Mayank R. Kapadia,et al.  A Review of Content Based Image Retrieval System , 2015 .

[5]  Henning Müller,et al.  Mobile Medical Visual Information Retrieval , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  Cheng Thao,et al.  GoldMiner: a radiology image search engine. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Henning Müller,et al.  Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 Medical Image Retrieval and Classification Tasks , 2012, CLEF.

[8]  L. R. Long,et al.  Content-based Image Retrieval for Scientific Literature Access , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  Henning Müller,et al.  Overview of the CLEF 2011 Medical Image Classification and Retrieval Tasks , 2011, CLEF.

[10]  Henning Müller,et al.  Comparing the quality of accessing medical literature using content-based visual and textual information retrieval , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval in Radiology: Current Status and Future Directions , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Henning Müller,et al.  Log analysis to understand medical professionals' image searching behaviour. , 2012, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[13]  Pascal Fallavollita,et al.  Is Single-View Fluoroscopy Sufficient in Guiding Cardiac Ablation Procedures? , 2010, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[14]  Antoine Geissbühler,et al.  A Review of Content{Based Image Retrieval Systems in Medical Applications { Clinical Bene(cid:12)ts and Future Directions , 2022 .

[15]  H Müller,et al.  A Survey on Visual Information Search Behavior and Requirements of Radiologists , 2012, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[16]  Rudolf Hanka,et al.  A review of intelligent content-based indexing and browsing of medical images , 1999 .

[17]  Henning Müllera,et al.  Health care professionals ’ image use and search behaviour , 2006 .

[18]  C. Langlotz RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  Henning Müller,et al.  Fusing visual and clinical information for lung tissue classification in high-resolution computed tomography , 2010, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[20]  D. Hansell,et al.  Obstructive lung diseases: texture classification for differentiation at CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[21]  Gwénolé Quellec,et al.  Case Retrieval in Medical Databases by Fusing Heterogeneous Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Antoine Geissbühler,et al.  3D Case-Based Retrieval for Interstitial Lung Diseases , 2009, MCBR-CDS.

[23]  Jimmy Lin,et al.  Concept Disambiguation for Improved Subject Access Using Multiple Knowledge Sources , 2007, LaTeCH@ACL 2007.