Stereotactic imaging for radiotherapy: accuracy of CT, MRI, PET and SPECT.

CT, MRI, PET and SPECT provide complementary information for treatment planning in stereotactic radiotherapy. Stereotactic correlation of these images requires commissioning tests to confirm the localization accuracy of each modality. A phantom was developed to measure the accuracy of stereotactic localization for CT, MRI, PET and SPECT in the head and neck region. To this end. the stereotactically measured coordinates of structures within the phantom were compared with their mechanically defined coordinates. For MRI, PET and SPECT, measurements were performed using two different devices. For MRI, T1- and T2-weighted imaging sequences were applied. For each measurement, the mean radial deviation in space between the stereotactically measured and mechanically defined position of target points was determined. For CT, the mean radial deviation was 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm. For MRI, the mean deviations ranged between 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm and 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm, depending on the MRI device and the imaging sequence. For PET, mean deviations of 1.1 +/- 0.5 mm and 2.4 +/- 0.3 mm were obtained. The mean deviations for SPECT were 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm and 2.0 +/- 0.6 mm. The phantom is well suited to determine the accuracy of stereotactic localization with CT, MRI, PET and SPECT in the head and neck region. The obtained accuracy is well below the physical resolution for CT, PET and SPECT, and of comparable magnitude for MRI. Since the localization accuracy may be device dependent, results obtained at one device cannot be generalized to others.

[1]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Retrospective Registration of PET and MR Brain Images: An Algorithm and Its Stereotactic Validation , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  V Sturm,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: a prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  V. Poutanen,et al.  Accuracy of a registration procedure for brain SPET and MRI: phantom and simulation studies. , 1997, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D. Charney,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Coregistration of Multislice SPECT and MR Brain Images by Fixed External Fiducials , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  U Pietrzyk,et al.  An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereotactic Coordinates with the Cosman-Roberts-Wells Frame , 2000, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[8]  O. Pastyr,et al.  Stereotactic computer tomography with a modified Riechert-Mundinger device as the basis for integrated stereotactic neuroradiological investigations , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  S Mutic,et al.  Stereotactic imaging quality assurance using an anthropomorphic phantom. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[10]  W Schlegel,et al.  Cerebral radiation surgery using moving field irradiation at a linear accelerator facility. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Lennart Thurfjell,et al.  Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  C. Yu,et al.  A Phantom Study of the Geometric Accuracy of Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereotactic Localization with the Leksell Stereotactic System , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[13]  W Schlegel,et al.  Computer systems and mechanical tools for stereotactically guided conformation therapy with linear accelerators. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  S. Goldman,et al.  Stereotactic brain biopsy guided by positron emission tomography (PET) with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose and [C-11]methionine. , 1997, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[15]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance angiography for radiosurgical treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  M Schwaiger,et al.  First experience with I-123-alpha-methyl-tyrosine spect in the 3-D radiation treatment planning of brain gliomas. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Zbigniew Petrovich,et al.  An image fusion study of the geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic localization system1 , 2001, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[18]  A. Luxen,et al.  Diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy guided by positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[20]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[21]  L. Schad,et al.  Three dimensional image correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  O Jäkel,et al.  Three-dimensional accuracy and interfractional reproducibility of patient fixation and positioning using a stereotactic head mask system. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  W Schlegel,et al.  Stereotactically guided fractionated radiotherapy: technical aspects. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.