An investigation of solar cell interconnection schemes within CPV modules using a validated temperature‐dependent SPICE network model

In this paper, we present a temperature-dependent network model of a concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) module. The ability of this network model to calculate different interconnection schemes within CPV modules is validated, and there is good agreement between the measured and calculated data. The model is used to quantify the influence of an inhomogeneous current and of a temperature distribution between the solar cells on the power output of a module. The different interconnection schemes that combine parallel and series connections are compared. The optimal interconnection scheme strongly depends on the variations in the short current densities and temperature differences between the solar cells as well as on the risk of ‘sudden death’ of individual solar cells. Optimal interconnection schemes for several scenarios are developed. A combination of parallel and series interconnections is found to be the most robust interconnection. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Aissa Chouder,et al.  Study of bypass diodes configuration on PV modules , 2009 .

[2]  Frank Dimroth,et al.  Validated front contact grid simulation for GaAs solar cells under concentrated sunlight , 2011 .

[3]  Carlos Algora,et al.  Explanation for the dark I–V curve of III–V concentrator solar cells , 2008 .

[4]  Y. P. Varshni.  Temperature dependence of the energy gap in semiconductors , 1967 .

[5]  Gerald Siefer,et al.  Increasing the Energy Yield of CPV Modules through Optimized Solar Cell Interconnection , 2011 .

[6]  Priyanka Singh,et al.  Modeling of Random Shading Effects in Solar Cells , 2011, 2011 21st International Conference on Systems Engineering.

[7]  J. W. Bishop.  Computer simulation of the effects of electrical mismatches in photovoltaic cell interconnection circuits , 1988 .

[8]  Syafaruddin,et al.  Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic (PV) system during partial shading based on a two-diode model , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[9]  Carlos Algora,et al.  Reliability analysis of temperature step-stress tests on III-V high concentrator solar cells , 2009, Microelectron. Reliab..

[10]  H. Outhred,et al.  Analysis and control of mismatch power loss in photovoltaic arrays , 1995 .

[11]  K. Naito,et al.  Simulation of I–V characteristics of a PV module with shaded PV cells , 2003 .

[12]  Ignacio Antón,et al.  Losses caused by dispersion of optical parameters and misalignments in PV concentrators , 2005 .

[13]  K. Araki,et al.  ARE ELECTRO‐LUMINESCENCE DEFECTS IN CONCENTRATOR III‐V CELLS RESPONSIBLE TO THERMAL RUNAWAY AND SUDDEN DEATH? , 2011 .

[14]  D. Aiken,et al.  Temperature dependent spectral response measurements for III-V multi-junction solar cells , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[15]  B. Galiana,et al.  Study of non-uniform light profiles on high concentration III–V solar cells using quasi-3D distributed models , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[16]  K. C. Reinhardt,et al.  Junction characteristics of Ga0.5In0.5P n+p diodes and solar cells , 1995 .

[17]  A. Abete,et al.  Analysis of photovoltaic modules with protection diodes in presence of mismatching , 1990, IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists.