Temporal Frequency Tuning Reveals Interactions between the Dorsal and Ventral Visual Streams

Visual processing of complex objects is supported by the ventral visual pathway in the service of object identification and by the dorsal visual pathway in the service of object-directed reaching and grasping. Here, we address how these two streams interact during tool processing, by exploiting the known asymmetry in projections of subcortical magnocellular and parvocellular inputs to the dorsal and ventral streams. The ventral visual pathway receives both parvocellular and magnocellular input, whereas the dorsal visual pathway receives largely magnocellular input. We used fMRI to measure tool preferences in parietal cortex when the images were presented at either high or low temporal frequencies, exploiting the fact that parvocellular channels project principally to the ventral but not dorsal visual pathway. We reason that regions of parietal cortex that exhibit tool preferences for stimuli presented at frequencies characteristic of the parvocellular pathway receive their inputs from the ventral stream. We found that the left inferior parietal lobule, in the vicinity of the supramarginal gyrus, exhibited tool preferences for images presented at low temporal frequencies, whereas superior and posterior parietal regions exhibited tool preferences for images present at high temporal frequencies. These data indicate that object identity, processed within the ventral stream, is communicated to the left inferior parietal lobule and may there combine with inputs from the dorsal visual pathway to allow for functionally appropriate object manipulation.

[1]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Observing Learned Object-specific Functional Grasps Preferentially Activates the Ventral Stream , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. L. Ralph,et al.  Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Two action systems in the human brain , 2013, Brain and Language.

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  A simple framework (ASF) for behavioral and neuroimaging experiments based on the psychophysics toolbox for MATLAB , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[6]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Extraction of 3D Shape from Texture and Shading in the Human Brain , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Frank E. Garcea,et al.  Parcellation of left parietal tool representations by functional connectivity , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Eric Achten,et al.  Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: Effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  F. Osiurak,et al.  Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. , 2010, Psychological review.

[13]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: evidence from fMRI , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Ronald R. Peeters,et al.  Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[16]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  A comparison of koniocellular, magnocellular and parvocellular receptive field properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus) , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  The Representation of Object-Directed Action and Function Knowledge in the Human Brain. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human superior parietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway , 2013, Cortex.

[23]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Left Inferior Parietal Representations for Skilled Hand-Object Interactions: Evidence from Stroke and Corticobasal Degeneration , 2007, Cortex.

[24]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Spatial Frequency Tuning Reveals Interactions between the Dorsal and Ventral Visual Systems , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Functional mapping of the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of human LGN , 2014, NeuroImage.

[26]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[27]  M. Arbib From grasp to language: Embodied concepts and the challenge of abstraction , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[28]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[30]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic identification and probabilistic mapping of two distinct areas within the anterior ventral bank of the human intraparietal sulcus , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Mixed parvocellular and magnocellular geniculate signals in visual area V4 , 1992, Nature.

[32]  Edward M. Callaway,et al.  A Disynaptic Relay from Superior Colliculus to Dorsal Stream Visual Cortex in Macaque Monkey , 2010, Neuron.

[33]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  The Processing of Three-Dimensional Shape from Disparity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  K. Amunts,et al.  Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Shinya Sakai,et al.  Does the Human Dorsal Stream Really Process a Category for Tools? , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  From 'acting on' to 'acting with': the functional anatomy of object-oriented action schemata. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[37]  Afra Wohlschläger,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Planning and Executing Actual Tool Use , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques , 2011, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  Ronald R. Peeters,et al.  Parietal regions processing visual 3D shape extracted from disparity , 2009, NeuroImage.