Dose reduction of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving sustained disease control: results of a prospective study

Objectives This study investigated the effects of dose step-down in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved sustained disease control with baricitinib 4 mg once a day. Methods Patients who completed a baricitinib phase 3 study could enter a long-term extension (LTE). In the LTE, patients who received baricitinib 4 mg for ≥15 months and maintained CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission (REM) were blindly randomised to continue 4 mg or taper to 2 mg. Patients could rescue (to 4 mg) if needed. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 48 weeks. Results Patients in both groups maintained LDA (80% 4 mg; 67% 2 mg) or REM (40% 4 mg; 33% 2 mg) over 48 weeks. However, dose reduction resulted in small, statistically significant increases in disease activity at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Dose reduction also produced earlier and more frequent relapse (loss of step-down criteria) over 48 weeks compared with 4 mg maintenance (23% 4 mg vs 37% 2 mg, p=0.001). Rescue rates were 10% for baricitinib 4 mg and 18% for baricitinib 2 mg. Dose reduction was associated with a numerically lower rate of non-serious infections (30.6 for baricitinib 4 mg vs 24.9 for 2 mg). Rates of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar across groups. Conclusions In a large randomised, blinded phase 3 study, maintenance of RA control following induction of sustained LDA/REM with baricitinib 4 mg was greater with continued 4 mg than after taper to 2 mg. Nonetheless, most patients tapered to 2 mg could maintain LDA/REM or recapture with return to 4 mg if needed.

[1]  L. Tham,et al.  Dose/Exposure‐Response Modeling to Support Dosing Recommendation for Phase III Development of Baricitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2017, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[2]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Baricitinib, Methotrexate, or Combination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and No or Limited Prior Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment , 2017, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[3]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Dougados,et al.  Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  J. Kremer,et al.  Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Yoshiya Tanaka,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Japanese Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Background Methotrexate Therapy: A 12-week, Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Study , 2016, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[7]  Raveendhara R. Bannuru,et al.  2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2016, Arthritis care & research.

[8]  Charles King,et al.  2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2016, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[9]  M. Dougados,et al.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force , 2015, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  J. O’Shea,et al.  The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. , 2015, Annual Review of Medicine.

[11]  M. Genovese,et al.  Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Biologic-free remission of established rheumatoid arthritis after discontinuation of abatacept: a prospective, multicentre, observational study in Japan , 2014, Rheumatology.

[13]  Yoshiya Tanaka,et al.  Discontinuation of adalimumab after achieving remission in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: 1-year outcome of the HONOR study , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  P. Emery,et al.  Discontinuation of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2013, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[15]  C. Allaart,et al.  The BeSt way of withdrawing biologic agents. , 2013, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[16]  K. Pavelka,et al.  Maintenance, reduction, or withdrawal of etanercept after treatment with etanercept and methotrexate in patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (PRESERVE): a randomised controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[17]  Tsutomu Takeuchi,et al.  EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Effect of resumption of second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that flared up after treatment discontinuation , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[19]  藤井隆夫 Treating rheumatoid arthritis to the target―関節リウマチの治療戦略をここまで変えたものは何か― , 2016 .

[20]  Raveendhara R. Bannuru,et al.  American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2015 .