Assessing dynamic functional connectivity in heterogeneous samples

&NA; Several methods have been developed to measure dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) in fMRI data. These methods are often based on a sliding‐window analysis, which aims to capture how the brain's functional organization varies over the course of a scan. The aim of many studies is to compare dFC across groups, such as younger versus older people. However, spurious group differences in measured dFC may be caused by other sources of heterogeneity between people. For example, the shape of the haemodynamic response function (HRF) and levels of measurement noise have been found to vary with age. We use a generic simulation framework for fMRI data to investigate the effect of such heterogeneity on estimates of dFC. Our findings show that, despite no differences in true dFC, individual differences in measured dFC can result from other (non‐dynamic) features of the data, such as differences in neural autocorrelation, HRF shape, connectivity strength and measurement noise. We also find that common dFC methods such as k‐means and multilayer modularity approaches can detect spurious group differences in dynamic connectivity due to inappropriate setting of their hyperparameters. fMRI studies therefore need to consider alternative sources of heterogeneity across individuals before concluding differences in dFC. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. HighlightsEstimates of dFC may be affected by various sources of between‐people heterogeneity.We simulated fMRI data to investigate the effect of such heterogeneity on dFC.Differences in estimated dFC resulted from non‐dynamic features of the data.Choice of parameters in common methods produced spurious group differences in dFC.

[1]  David T. Jones,et al.  Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[3]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  Evaluation of sliding window correlation performance for characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Accurate classification of schizophrenia patients based on novel resting-state fMRI features , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Higher Dimensional Meta-State Analysis Reveals Reduced Resting fMRI Connectivity Dynamism in Schizophrenia Patients , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  M. Lindquist.  The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. , 2008, 0906.3662.

[9]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Pablo Balenzuela,et al.  Criticality in Large-Scale Brain fMRI Dynamics Unveiled by a Novel Point Process Analysis , 2012, Front. Physio..

[11]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Dale,et al.  Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  To Smooth or Not to Smooth? Bias and Efficiency in fMRI Time-Series Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[16]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Transient brain activity disentangles fMRI resting-state dynamics in terms of spatially and temporally overlapping networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[17]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Disambiguating brain functional connectivity , 2017 .

[20]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Variational Inference for Bayesian Mixtures of Factor Analysers , 1999, NIPS.

[21]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Functional Connectivity in MRI Is Driven by Spontaneous BOLD Events , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  Erin L. Mazerolle,et al.  Metabolic and vascular origins of the BOLD effect: Implications for imaging pathology and resting‐state brain function , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Wei Gao,et al.  Task‐related modulation of functional connectivity variability and its behavioral correlations , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[24]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data , 2011 .

[25]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.

[26]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Disambiguating brain functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Effect of Normal Aging on the Coupling of Neural Activity to the Bold Hemodynamic Response , 1999, NeuroImage.

[28]  G. McCarthy,et al.  The Effects of Aging upon the Hemodynamic Response Measured by Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  F. Hanlon,et al.  Hemodynamic response function abnormalities in schizophrenia during a multisensory detection task , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Task-Based Core-Periphery Organization of Human Brain Dynamics , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Impact of autocorrelation on functional connectivity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[32]  J. Pillai.  Functional Connectivity. , 2017, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[33]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Estimation of dynamic functional connectivity using Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives , 2015, NeuroImage.

[35]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Robust Detection of Dynamic Community Structure in Networks , 2012, Chaos.

[36]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Review of methods for functional brain connectivity detection using fMRI , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[37]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information , 2015, NeuroImage.

[39]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  C. Carter,et al.  The BOLD Hemodynamic Response in Healthy Aging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Vesa Kiviniemi,et al.  A Sliding Time-Window ICA Reveals Spatial Variability of the Default Mode Network in Time , 2011, Brain Connect..

[43]  Matthias Ekman,et al.  Dynamic reconfigurations of human brain networks , 2016 .

[44]  Andrew P. Smith,et al.  State and trait , 1992 .

[45]  Timothy E. Ham,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Brain Network Connectivity Maintains Cognition across the Lifespan Despite Accelerated Decay of Regional Brain Activation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.