Courtship dives of Anna's hummingbird offer insights into flight performance limits

Behavioural displays are a common feature of animal courtship. Just as female preferences can generate exaggerated male ornaments, female preferences for dynamic behaviours may cause males to perform courtship displays near intrinsic performance limits. I provide an example of an extreme display, the courtship dive of Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). Diving male Anna's hummingbirds were filmed with a combination of high-speed and conventional video cameras. After powering the initial stage of the dive by flapping, males folded their wings by their sides, at which point they reached an average maximum velocity of 385 body lengths s−1 (27.3 m s−1). This is the highest known length-specific velocity attained by any vertebrate. This velocity suggests their body drag coefficient is less than 0.3. They then spread their wings to pull up, and experienced centripetal accelerations nearly nine times greater than gravitational acceleration. This acceleration is the highest reported for any vertebrate undergoing a voluntary aerial manoeuvre, except jet fighter pilots. Stereotyped courtship behaviours offer several advantages for the study of extreme locomotor performance, and can be assessed in a natural context.

[1]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[2]  Alden H. Miller.  The Boom-Flight of the Pacific Nighthawk , 1925 .

[3]  A Man-Carrying Centrifuge , 1955, Nature.

[4]  H. Bennet-Clark,et al.  The jump of the flea: a study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. , 1967, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  References , 1971 .

[6]  H. Krebs.  The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[7]  S. A. Wainwright,et al.  Mechanical Design in Organisms , 2020 .

[8]  J. Krebs,et al.  The “August Krogh principle” , 1980 .

[9]  F. G. Stiles.  Aggressive and Courtship Displays of the Male Anna's Hummingbird , 1982 .

[10]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  SPEED, ACCELERATION AND MANOEUVRABILITY OF TWO TELEOST FISHES , 1983 .

[11]  H. Woltring.  On optimal smoothing and derivative estimation from noisy displacement data in biomechanics , 1985 .

[12]  G. Rüppell.  Kinematic Analysis of Symmetrical Flight Manoeuvres of Odonata , 1989 .

[13]  Accelerational Implications of Hummingbird Display Dives , 1995 .

[14]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Wingbeat frequency and the body drag anomaly: wind-tunnel observations on a thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and a teal (Anas crecca) , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  R. Prum.  Sexual selection and the evolution of mechanical sound production in manakins (Aves: Pipridae) , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Warrick,et al.  The turning- and linear-maneuvering performance of birds : the cost of efficiency for coursing insectivores , 1998 .

[17]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  ESTIMATING VELOCITIES AND ACCELERATIONS OF ANIMAL LOCOMOTION: A SIMULATION EXPERIMENT COMPARING NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION ALGORITHMS , 1998 .

[19]  Tucker.  Gliding flight: speed and acceleration of ideal falcons during diving and pull out. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  Tucker,et al.  Diving speeds and angles of a gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  Hateren,et al.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  A Hedenström,et al.  Field estimates of body drag coefficient on the basis of dives in passerine birds. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  T. Garland,et al.  Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: Investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system , 2001 .

[24]  Bret W Tobalske,et al.  Take-off mechanics in hummingbirds (Trochilidae) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  NATURAL VARIATION IN FLIGHT PERFORMANCE IS RELATED TO TIMING OF BREEDING IN TREE SWALLOWS (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) IN NEW YORK , 2004 .

[26]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  J. Husak.  Does survival depend on how fast you can run or how fast you do run , 2006 .

[29]  Karin Nordström,et al.  Small object detection neurons in female hoverflies , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  S. Patek,et al.  Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: Ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  A. Biewener,et al.  Low speed maneuvering flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo (Eolophus roseicapillus). I. Kinematic and neuromuscular control of turning , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  Bret W Tobalske,et al.  Biomechanics of bird flight , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of behavior. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  C. J. Clark,et al.  The Anna's hummingbird chirps with its tail: a new mechanism of sonation in birds , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  P. Bahr.  On the “Bleating” or “Drumming” of the Snipe (Gallinago cœlestis) , 2009 .

[36]  C. J. Clark,et al.  Flight costs of long, sexually selected tails in hummingbirds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  D. Altshuler,et al.  Fiber type homogeneity of the flight musculature in small birds. , 2009, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[38]  Anna's Hummingbird , 2010 .