Quantities, Amounts, and the Numerical Core System

Numerical cognition is essential to many aspects of life and arithmetic abilities predict academic achievements better than reading (Estrada et al., 2004). Accordingly, it is important to understand the building blocks of numerical cognition, the neural tissue involved, and the developmental trajectories. In the last two decades research has made impressive strides forward in studying numerical cognition and brain mechanisms involved in arithmetic. This advance was marked by suggestions of a numerical core system that can be characterized as a set of intuitions for quantities innately available to humans (Brannon et al., 2006) and animals (Cantlon and Brannon, 2007). We suggest that another system, evolved to perceive and evaluate non-countable dimensions like size or amount of substance may be important for the evolution of the numerical system and numerical abilities. The current opinion article examines this idea and the possible interplay between, on the one hand perception and evaluation of continuous dimensions and, on the other, the numerical system.

[1]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  W. Banks,et al.  Discriminations among perceptual and symbolic stimuli , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[4]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[6]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[10]  S. Dehaene Origins of Mathematical Intuitions , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Endogenously Generated and Visually Guided Saccades after Lesions of the Human Frontal Eye Fields , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[14]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students , 2004, Cognition.

[15]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[16]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  What can developmental and comparative cognitive neuroscience tell us about the adult human brain? , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are Arabic and verbal numbers processed in different ways? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Carlos A Estrada,et al.  Literacy and Numeracy Skills and Anticoagulation Control , 2004, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[20]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  P H Schiller,et al.  Developmental study of color-word interference. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Christophe Mussolin,et al.  The nonintentional processing of Arabic numbers in children , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[23]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[24]  A. Henik,et al.  Double Dissociation of Functions in Developmental Dyslexia and Dyscalculia , 2006 .

[25]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  The equality of quantity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. , 2006, Developmental science.

[27]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  A Cohen,et al.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. , 1990, Science.

[29]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  H. Heinze,et al.  On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  S. Link Modeling imageless thought: The relative judgment theory of numerical comparisons ☆ , 1990 .

[32]  Karin Landerl,et al.  Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  Avishai Henik,et al.  When brightness counts: the neuronal correlate of numerical-luminance interference. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison. , 2008, Developmental science.

[35]  J. B.,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[36]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Soon Chun Siong,et al.  Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes , 2006, Brain Research.

[38]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Perceived size matters , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  E. Spelke,et al.  Number-Space Mapping in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[40]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Basic numerical processing in left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) acalculia , 2008, Cortex.

[41]  D. Ansari Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic : The “ neuronal recycling ” hypothesis , 2004 .

[44]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Numerical and arithmetical cognition: patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Kristine L Koontz,et al.  Identifying Simple Numerical Stimuli: Processing Inefficiencies Exhibited by Arithmetic Learning Disabled Children , 1996 .

[47]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[48]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language , 2003 .

[50]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  D. Linden,et al.  Processing conflicting information: Facilitation, interference, and functional connectivity , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[53]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[54]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[55]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[57]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[58]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[59]  Avishai Henik,et al.  A common representation for semantic and physical properties: a cognitive-anatomical approach. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[60]  K. Moeller,et al.  Basic number processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia: Evidence from eye tracking , 2009 .

[61]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Individual differences in children’s mathematical competence are related to the intentional but not automatic processing of Arabic numerals , 2011, Cognition.

[62]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009) , 2011, Cognition.

[63]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Children's Judgments of Numerical Inequality. , 1977 .

[64]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[65]  Gavin R. Price,et al.  Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia , 2007, Current Biology.

[66]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  E. Brannon Number knows no bounds , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.