A search for the optimal thresholding sequence in an associative memory

In learning matrix associative memory networks, the choice of threshold value is one of the most significant factors for determining the recall performance. Choice of threshold is especially important for multi-step recall, as each network state is dependent on the prior states. Recently, Gibson and Robinson used a statistical approximation to formalize the dynamics of partially connected recurrent networks. Using this formalism, we evaluate all of the possible thresholding sequences and find the sequence that results in the highest storage capacity. The resulting optimal strategy can be closely approximated by a threshold that is proportional to the activation of the network plus an offset. The performance of a simulated associative memory is shown to match well with the predictions of the theory. This strategy corresponds to one of the simplest putative roles of interneurons which provide a linear output proportional to the total unweighted input from the principal cells.

[1]  David J. Willshaw,et al.  Improving recall from an associative memory , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Örjan Ekeberg,et al.  Reliability and Speed of Recall in an Associative Network , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  A. R. Gardner-Medwin Doubly modifiable synapses: a model of short and long term auto-associative memory , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  John Robinson,et al.  Statistical analysis of the dynamics of a sparse associative memory , 1992, Neural Networks.

[5]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  David Willshaw,et al.  On setting unit thresholds in an incompletely connected associative net Network: Comput , 1993 .

[7]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Max R. Bennett,et al.  Dynamics of the CA3 pyramidal neuron autoassociative memory network in the hippocampus. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Characteristics of sparsely encoded associative memory , 1989, Neural Networks.

[10]  A. R. Gardner-Medwin The recall of events through the learning of associations between their parts , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  H. C. LONGUET-HIGGINS,et al.  Non-Holographic Associative Memory , 1969, Nature.

[12]  D J Willshaw,et al.  An assessment of Marr's theory of the hippocampus as a temporary memory store. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  Günther Palm,et al.  Information capacity in recurrent McCulloch-Pitts networks with sparsely coded memory states , 1992 .

[14]  A Kartashov,et al.  Quality and efficiency of retrieval for Willshaw-like autoassociative networks. II. Recognition , 1995 .

[15]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? Network , 1991 .

[16]  J. Buckingham,et al.  Delicate nets, faint recollections : a study of partially connected associative network memories , 1992 .

[17]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.