Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation.

We tested the mechanical properties of single microtubules by lateral indentation with the tip of an atomic force microscope. Indentations up to approximately 3.6 nm, i.e., 15% of the microtubule diameter, resulted in an approximately linear elastic response, and indentations were reversible without hysteresis. At an indentation force of around 0.3 nN we observed an instability corresponding to an approximately 1-nm indentation step in the taxol-stabilized microtubules, which could be due to partial or complete rupture of a relatively small number of lateral or axial tubulin-tubulin bonds. These indentations were reversible with hysteresis when the tip was retracted and no trace of damage was observed in subsequent high-resolution images. Higher forces caused substantial damage to the microtubules, which either led to depolymerization or, occasionally, to slowly reannealing holes in the microtubule wall. We modeled the experimental results using finite-element methods and find that the simple assumption of a homogeneous isotropic material, albeit structured with the characteristic protofilament corrugations, is sufficient to explain the linear elastic response of microtubules.

[1]  T. Ando,et al.  A high-speed atomic force microscope for studying biological macromolecules in action. , 2003, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[2]  R. Himes,et al.  Alterations in number of protofilaments in microtubules assembled in vitro , 1978, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  E. Nogales,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly , 2005, Nature.

[4]  William V Nicholson,et al.  Microtubule structure at 8 A resolution. , 2002, Structure.

[5]  A. Matus,et al.  Domains of Neuronal Microtubule-associated Proteins and Flexural Rigidity of Microtubules , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  R. Wade,et al.  How does taxol stabilize microtubules? , 1995, Current Biology.

[7]  D. Odde,et al.  Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  K. Böhm,et al.  Structural diversity and dynamics of microtubules and polymorphic tubulin assemblies. , 1990, Electron microscopy reviews.

[9]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[10]  M. Schliwa,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[11]  S. Halpain,et al.  MAP2 and tau bind longitudinally along the outer ridges of microtubule protofilaments , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  How tubulin subunits are lost from the shortening ends of microtubules. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[14]  L. Amos,et al.  How Taxol stabilises microtubule structure. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[15]  B. Mickey,et al.  Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[17]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Resolving the molecular structure of microtubules under physiological conditions with scanning force microscopy , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[18]  F Metoz,et al.  Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  L. Cassimeris,et al.  Regulation of microtubule-associated proteins. , 2001, International review of cytology.

[20]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2002 .

[21]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[22]  D. H. Snyder,et al.  MICROTUBULES: EVIDENCE FOR 13 PROTOFILAMENTS , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  I. Jánosi,et al.  Mechanical stress induced mechanism of microtubule catastrophes. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  B. Alberts,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell (Fifth Edition) , 2008 .

[25]  A C Maggs,et al.  Analysis of microtubule rigidity using hydrodynamic flow and thermal fluctuations. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  S. Fuller,et al.  Microtubules switch occasionally into unfavorable configurations during elongation. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation and collapse of microtubules on the nanometer scale. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[28]  James C. Lee,et al.  [36] Preparation of tubulin from brain , 1982 .

[29]  W. H. Reid,et al.  The Theory of Elasticity , 1960 .

[30]  W F Heinz,et al.  Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[31]  J. Lee,et al.  Preparation of tubulin from brain. , 1982, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  K. Ewert,et al.  Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of microtubules buckling and bundling under osmotic stress: a probe of interprotofilament interactions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[33]  J. Sader,et al.  Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers , 1999 .

[34]  Yves Engelborghs,et al.  Dynamical and mechanical study of immobilized microtubules with atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[35]  D. Odde,et al.  Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[36]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[37]  J. Gómez‐Herrero,et al.  Jumping mode scanning force microscopy: a suitable technique for imaging DNA in liquids , 2003 .

[38]  Julio Gómez-Herrero,et al.  Jumping mode scanning force microscopy , 1998 .

[39]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .