Data quality through a web-based QA/QC system: implementation for atmospheric mercury data from the global mercury observation system.

The overall goal of the on-going Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) project is to develop a coordinated global monitoring network for mercury, including ground-based, high altitude and sea level stations. In order to ensure data reliability and comparability, a significant effort has been made to implement a centralized system, which is designed to quality assure and quality control atmospheric mercury datasets. This system, GMOS-Data Quality Management (G-DQM), uses a web-based approach with real-time adaptive monitoring procedures aimed at preventing the production of poor-quality data. G-DQM is plugged on a cyberinfrastructure and deployed as a service. Atmospheric mercury datasets, produced during the first-three years of the GMOS project, are used as the input to demonstrate the application of the G-DQM and how it identifies a number of key issues concerning data quality. The major issues influencing data quality are presented and discussed for the GMOS stations under study. Atmospheric mercury data collected at the Longobucco (Italy) station is used as a detailed case study.

[1]  R. Ebinghaus,et al.  Trends in air concentration and deposition of mercury in the coastal environment of the North Sea Area , 2007 .

[2]  R. Stevens,et al.  Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  S. E. Lindberg,et al.  Atmospheric Mercury Speciation: Concentrations and Behavior of Reactive Gaseous Mercury in Ambient Air , 1998 .

[4]  P. Blanchard,et al.  A comparison of data quality control protocols for atmospheric mercury speciation measurements. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[5]  Wenche Aas,et al.  Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009 , 2012 .

[6]  Oliver Lindqvist,et al.  Atmospheric mercury—a review* , 1985 .

[7]  Elisabeth Galarneau,et al.  Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition , 2011 .

[8]  S. Pehkonen,et al.  The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review , 1999 .

[9]  S. Cinnirella,et al.  The GMOS cyber(e)-infrastructure: advanced services for supporting science and policy , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  H. Skov,et al.  A synthesis of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow , 2008 .

[11]  A. Richter,et al.  Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  ICT Methodologies and Spatial Data Infrastructure for Air Quality Information Management , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Quantity is Nothing without Quality: Automated QA/QC for Streaming Environmental Sensor Data , 2013 .