Analysis of the Influence of the GPS Errors Occurred While Collecting Electrode Coordinates on the Electrical Resistivity of Tumuli †

In archaeological applications the accurate reconstruction of buried structures is mandatory. Electrical resistivity tomography is widely used for this purpose. Nevertheless, resistivity errors could be generated by wrong placement of electrodes. Papers in the literature do not discuss the influence of errors connected with the electrode position location (GPS-error). In this paper the first results of a Monte Carlo simulation analysis of data acquired on a tumulus are presented. The main research questions were: (i) if it is correct to ignore the GPS-error collect, and (ii) if a minimum threshold, that significantly affect the inversion, exists. Results, obtained considering planimetric GPS-errors of about one third of the fixed electrode distances, show that the GPS-errors affect resistivity, but the generated errors/anomalies: (a) are lower than that obtained without considering the topography, and (b) are significant from a numerical point of view, but do not affect the interpretation, being compatible with the soil resistivity ranges.

[1]  Douglas W. Hubbard,et al.  The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It , 2009 .

[2]  Christian Camerlynck,et al.  The location of infinite electrodes in pole–pole electrical surveys: consequences for 2D imaging , 1999 .

[3]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[4]  Myeong-Jong Yi,et al.  ERT imaging of the interior of the huge tumulus of Kastas in Amphipolis (northern Greece) , 2018, Archaeological Prospection.

[5]  L. S. Edwards,et al.  A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP , 1977 .

[6]  Gaetano Ranieri,et al.  Three-dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography to control the injection of expanding resins for the treatment and stabilization of foundation soils , 2011 .

[7]  M. Lelliott,et al.  Extreme sensitivity of crosshole electrical resistivity tomography measurements to geometric errors , 2008 .

[8]  Ahzegbobor P. Aizebeokhai,et al.  Anomaly effects of orthogonal paired-arrays for 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging , 2011 .

[9]  Susan S. Hubbard,et al.  The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales , 2015, Water resources research.

[10]  Jorge Trota Filho,et al.  Uncertainty of measurement by Monte-Carlo simulation and metrological reliability in the evaluation of electric variables of PEMFC and SOFC fuel cells , 2009 .

[11]  R. Fanti,et al.  A Review of the Advantages and Limitations of Geophysical Investigations in Landslide Studies , 2019, International Journal of Geophysics.

[12]  Gianfranco Morelli,et al.  ROBUST SCHEME FOR ERT INVERSE MODELING , 1996 .

[13]  Gaetano Ranieri,et al.  4D cross-borehole electrical resistivity tomography to control resin injection for ground stabilization: a case history in Venice (Italy) , 2013 .

[14]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Interpolation of landslide movements to improve the accuracy of 4D geoelectrical monitoring , 2015 .

[15]  Marcantonio Catelani,et al.  Sensitivity analysis with MC simulation for the failure rate evaluation and reliability assessment , 2015 .

[16]  Riccardo Fanti,et al.  Assessing subsoil void hazards along a road system using H/V measurements, ERTs and IPTs to support local decision makers , 2018 .

[17]  Silvia Bersan,et al.  Combined geophysical surveys for the characterization of a reconstructed river embankment , 2016 .

[18]  Salvatore Piro,et al.  3D inversion of ERT data on an archaeological site using GPR reflection and 3D inverted magnetic data as a priori information , 2015 .

[19]  R. Clement,et al.  How should an electrical resistivity tomography laboratory test cell be designed? Numerical investigation of error on electrical resistivity measurement , 2016 .

[20]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[21]  Deodato Tapete,et al.  An electric and electromagnetic geophysical approach for subsurface investigation of anthropogenic mounds in an urban environment , 2016 .

[22]  Antonio Galgaro,et al.  Investigations on the structural setting of a landslide-prone slope by means of three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[23]  Sándor Szalai,et al.  Effect of Positional Inaccuracies on Multielectrode Results , 2007 .

[24]  T. Dahlin,et al.  Properties and Effects of Measurement Errors on 2D Resistivity Imaging Surveying , 2003 .

[25]  Ljubica Zupunski,et al.  Measurement uncertainty estimation of health risk from exposure to natural radionuclides in soil , 2013 .

[26]  Fernando A. Monteiro Santos,et al.  Detection and 2d modelling of cavities using pole–dipole array , 2005 .

[27]  Partha S. Routh,et al.  Sensitivity of electrical resistivity tomography data to electrode position errors , 2005 .

[28]  Richard Daniel De Puma.  La necropoli di Vetulonia nel periodo orientalizzante , 2019, Etruscan Studies.

[29]  Myeong-Jong Yi,et al.  Geophysical investigation of tumuli by means of surface 3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography , 2010 .

[30]  A. Binley,et al.  Hydrogeophysics : opportunities and challenges , 2010 .

[31]  Oliver Kuras,et al.  Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method , 2013 .

[32]  Andreas Weller,et al.  The effect of dike geometry on different resistivity configurations , 2005 .

[33]  Yannick Fargier,et al.  A cost‐effective 3D electrical resistivity imaging approach applied to dike investigation , 2017 .

[34]  Michael J. Rycroft,et al.  Understanding GPS. Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[35]  E. Rizzo,et al.  High Resolution Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) in a Transition Zone Environment: Application for Detailed Internal Architecture and Infilling Processes Study of a Rhône River Paleo-channel , 2005 .

[36]  Myeong-Jong Yi,et al.  Comparison of Measuring Strategies for the 3-D Electrical Resistivity Imaging of Tumuli , 2014 .

[37]  Marco Tarabini,et al.  Use of design of experiments and Monte Carlo method for instruments optimal design , 2013 .

[38]  René E. Chávez,et al.  ‘Illuminating’ the interior of Kukulkan's Pyramid, Chichén Itzá, Mexico, by means of a non-conventional ERT geophysical survey , 2018 .

[39]  M. Fressard,et al.  Multi-method characterisation of an active landslide: Case study in the Pays d'Auge plateau (Normandy, France) , 2016 .

[40]  Apostolos Sarris,et al.  Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities , 2007 .

[41]  Stephen Razafindratsima,et al.  Estimation of the error made in Pole–Dipole Electrical Resistivity Tomography depending on the location of the remote electrode: Modeling and field study , 2014 .

[42]  Riccardo Fanti,et al.  Integrated geophysical survey in a sinkhole-prone area: Microgravity, electrical resistivity tomographies, and seismic noise measurements to delimit its extension , 2018, Engineering Geology.