The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes

Abstract The notion of polycentric governance has become increasingly popular in recent years. Such development may be attributed to expectations that polycentric governance systems have a higher capacity to deal with complex challenges arising from global and climate change. Most often, employed interpretations of polycentricity emphasize the presence of several independent centers of authority in a governance domain. A commonly neglected feature of polycentric governance, as introduced by Elinor and Vincent Ostrom, is that this concept entails as well operation under one set of overall accepted rules. This paper analyzes the underlying feature of effective polycentric governance and makes a distinction between polycentric, fragmented, and centralized governance regimes. An empirical analysis of water governance systems in 27 national river basins using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) shows that a set of factors associated with polycentricity has the highest explanatory power for high performance regarding climate change adaptation. Factors associated with fragmented and centralized regimes can be identified for paths leading to low performance. Furthermore, the analysis identifies the effectiveness of formal institutions as important condition, in particular for paths leading toward low performance. The paper elaborates on these findings and discusses as well the potential of fsQCA in such comparative analyses.

[1]  Judith Glaesser,et al.  Paradoxes and Pitfalls in Using Fuzzy Set QCA: Illustrations from a Critical Review of a Study of Educational Inequality , 2011 .

[2]  E. Lieberman.  The perils of polycentric governance of infectious disease in South Africa. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives , 1985, Inf. Sci..

[4]  E. Ostrom.  Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.

[5]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice , 2011 .

[7]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[8]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Global Water Governance: Challenges and Future Scope Missing Links in Global Water Governance: a Processes-Oriented Analysis , 2013 .

[9]  R. Boelens,et al.  Water Property Relations and Modern Policy Regimes: Neoliberal Utopia and the Disempowerment of Collective Action , 2010 .

[10]  E. Ostrom.  Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change , 2010 .

[11]  L. Gross,et al.  Out of the mainstream: sexual minorities and the mass media. , 1991, Journal of homosexuality.

[12]  John FitzGibbon,et al.  The Expanding Institutional Context for Water Resources Management: The Case of the Grand River Watershed , 2005 .

[13]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Australia's Murray-Darling Basin: A Century of Polycentric Experiments in Cross-Border Integration of Water Resources Management , 2013 .

[14]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Configurational Comparative Methods , 2011 .

[15]  Vlad Tarko,et al.  Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond , 2012 .

[16]  Svend-Erik Skaaning,et al.  Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results , 2011 .

[17]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration, and Polycentricity , 2012 .

[18]  Gregorio López Sanz,et al.  Irrigated agriculture in the Guadiana River high basin (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain): environmental and socioeconomic impacts , 1999 .

[19]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  The role of the state in governing the commons , 2014 .

[20]  P. R. Lankao,et al.  Paradoxes of Decentralization: Water Reform and Social Implications in Mexico , 2006 .

[21]  Ed Brown,et al.  Neoliberal Reform, Governance and Corruption in the South: Assessing the International Anti‐Corruption Crusade , 2004 .

[22]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Political Pitfalls of Integrated Watershed Management , 2005 .

[23]  G. Tullock.  Public Goods, Redistribution And Rent Seeking , 2008 .

[24]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective , 2008 .

[25]  Valentina Krysanova,et al.  Cross-Comparison of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies Across Large River Basins in Europe, Africa and Asia , 2010 .

[26]  Xavier Basurto,et al.  Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis: Insights from twenty years of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica , 2013 .

[27]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[28]  Hussein H. Soliman,et al.  Sinking under the weight of corruption: Neoliberal reform, political accountability and justice , 2011 .

[29]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA) , 2008 .

[30]  A. R. D. da Silveira,et al.  The Link Between Polycentrism and Adaptive Capacity in River Basin Governance Systems: Insights from the River Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin , 2013 .

[31]  V. Ostrom,et al.  The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry , 1961, American Political Science Review.

[32]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Patterns of metropolitan policing , 1978 .

[33]  S. Kuks,et al.  The evolution of national water regimes in Europe : transitions in water rights and water policies , 2004 .

[34]  David Aubin,et al.  The Evolution of European Water Policy Towards integrated resource management at EU level , 2004 .

[35]  Victoria Reyes-García,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Adaptation to Global Environmental Change: North and South Perspectives Traditional ecological knowledge among transhumant pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain , 2013 .

[36]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[37]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Metropolitan Reform: Propositions Derived From Two Traditions. , 1972 .

[38]  E. Thomas.  Public policy 11. , 2013 .

[39]  Pedro Martínez-Santos,et al.  Wetland Restoration in the Mancha Occidental Aquifer, Spain: A Critical Perspective on Water, Agricultural, and Environmental Policies , 2008 .

[40]  K. Bakker,et al.  Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis. By Karen Bakker , 2012 .

[41]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[42]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[43]  John A. Hoornbeek.  Policy-making institutions and water policy outputs in the European Union and the United States: a comparative analysis , 2004 .

[44]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[45]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins , 2012 .

[46]  M. Ramón Llamas,et al.  Vulnerability assessment of groundwater resources: A modelling-based approach to the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  Jonathan Cloke,et al.  Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in Central America: Exploring the Nicaraguan case , 2005 .

[48]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[49]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .