Storable Votes

Motivated by the need for more flexible decision-making mechanisms in the European Union, the paper proposes a simple but novel voting scheme for binary decisions taken by committees that meet regularly over time. At each meeting, committee members are allowed to store their vote for future use; the decision is then taken according to the majority of votes cast. The possibility of shifting votes intertemporally allows agents to concentrate their votes when preferences are more intense, and although the scheme will not in general achieve full efficiency, making votes storable typically leads to ex ante welfare gains. The analysis in the paper suggests that the result will hold if one of the following conditions is satisfied: (i) the number of voters is above a minimum threshold; (ii) preferences are not too polarized; (iii) the horizon is long enough.

[1]  Walter J. Oleszek Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process , 1978 .

[2]  John A. Ferejohn,et al.  Sour Notes on the Theory of Vote Trading , 1974 .

[3]  Matthew A. Turner,et al.  Meetings with Costly Participation , 2000 .

[4]  R. Lucas,et al.  On Efficient Distribution With Private Information , 1992 .

[5]  Steven J. Brams Game Theory and Politics , 2013, Dover Books on Science.

[6]  James M. Snyder,et al.  Equilibrium and efficiency in an organized vote market , 1996 .

[7]  S. Athey,et al.  Optimal Collusion with Private Information , 1999 .

[8]  R. Townsend Optimal Multiperiod Contracts and the Gain from Enduring Relationships under Private Information , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information , 1997 .

[10]  D. Mueller Public choice II , 1989 .

[11]  Robert J. Weber,et al.  Distributional Strategies for Games with Incomplete Information , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  A Theory of Political Compromise , 1998 .

[13]  T. Piketty,et al.  Information Aggregation Through Voting and Vote-Trading , 2002 .

[14]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Incentives and incomplete information , 1979 .

[15]  T. Piketty,et al.  The information-aggregation approach to political institutions , 1999 .

[16]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  Voting with Proportional Veto Power , 1982 .

[17]  H. Moulin Dominance Solvable Voting Schemes , 1979 .

[18]  Colin M. Campbell Large Electorates and Decisive Minorities , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Christopher Phelan,et al.  Computing Multi-Period, Information-Constrained Optima , 1991 .

[20]  G. Scofield,et al.  The calculus of consent. , 1990, The Hastings Center report.

[21]  Francis T. Seow,et al.  The tyranny of the majority , 1990 .

[22]  Burt L. Monroe,et al.  The Principles of Parliamentary Representation , 1996 .

[23]  G. Cox Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems , 1990 .

[24]  S. Brams,et al.  The Paradox of Vote Trading , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  The approximation of efficient public good mechanisms by simple voting schemes , 2002 .

[26]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Minority Representation in Multimember Districts , 1998, American Political Science Review.