Discriminating between Native Norway Spruce and Invasive Sitka Spruce - A Comparison of Multitemporal Landsat 8 Imagery, Aerial Images and Airborne Laser Scanner Data

Invasive species can be considered a threat to biodiversity, and remote sensing has been proposed as a tool for detection and monitoring of invasive species. In this study, we test the ability to discriminate between two tree species of the same genera, using data from Landsat 8 satellite imagery, aerial images, and airborne laser scanning. Ground observations from forest stands dominated by either Norway spruce (Picea abies) or Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were coupled with variables derived from each of the three sets of remote sensing data. Random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression classification models were fit to the data, and the classification accuracy tested by performing a cross-validation. Classification accuracies were compared for different combinations of remote sensing data and classification methods. The overall classification accuracy varied from 0.53 to 0.79, with the highest accuracy obtained using logistic regression with a combination of data derived from Landsat imagery and aerial images. The corresponding kappa value was 0.58. The contribution to the classification accuracy from using airborne data in addition to Landsat imagery was not substantial in this study. The classification accuracy varied between models using data from individual Landsat images.

[1]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[2]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Tree Species Recognition Based on Airborne Laser Scanning and Complementary Data Sources , 2014 .

[3]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[4]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Remote sensing of native and invasive species in Hawaiian forests , 2008 .

[5]  T. L. Moen,et al.  Alien species in Norway - with the Norwegian Black List 2012. , 2012 .

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien , 2014 .

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Jerry A. Griffith,et al.  Remote Sensing and Mapping of Tamarisk along the Colorado River, USA: A Comparative Use of Summer-Acquired Hyperion, Thematic Mapper and QuickBird Data , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Alex Zvoleff,et al.  Calculate Textures from Grey-Level Co-Occurrence Matrices(GLCMs) , 2015 .

[10]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[11]  D. Fuller.  Remote detection of invasive Melaleuca trees (Melaleuca quinquenervia) in South Florida with multispectral IKONOS imagery , 2005 .

[12]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[13]  S. Franklin,et al.  Aerial Image Texture Information in the Estimation of Northern Deciduous and Mixed Wood Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI) , 1998 .

[14]  Qingxi Tong,et al.  Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance , 2014 .

[15]  D. Donoghue,et al.  Remote sensing of species mixtures in conifer plantations using LiDAR height and intensity data , 2007 .

[16]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[17]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, ProbabilityTheory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien , 2015 .

[18]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Applications of Remote Sensing to Alien Invasive Plant Studies , 2009, Sensors.

[19]  Pete Watt,et al.  An evaluation of the use of satellite data for monitoring early development of young Sitka spruce plantation forest growth , 2004 .

[20]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[21]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Combining national forest inventory field plots and remote sensing data for forest databases , 2008 .

[22]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[23]  David J. Hand,et al.  ROC Curves for Continuous Data , 2009 .

[24]  Arnt Kristian Gjertsen,et al.  Accuracy of forest mapping based on Landsat TM data and a kNN-based method , 2007 .

[25]  B. Bradley.  Remote detection of invasive plants: a review of spectral, textural and phenological approaches , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[26]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[27]  E. Næsset,et al.  Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[28]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR - effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type , 2010 .

[30]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Invasive species detection in Hawaiian rainforests using airborne imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. , 2008 .

[31]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[32]  D. Gorchov,et al.  Detecting an invasive shrub in a deciduous forest understory using late‐fall Landsat sensor imagery , 2007 .

[33]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..