Spatiotemporal Group Dynamics in a Long-Distance Migratory Bird

Thousands of species migrate [1]. Though we have some understanding of where and when they travel, we still have very little insight into who migrates with whom and for how long. Group formation is pivotal in allowing individuals to interact, transfer information, and adapt to changing conditions [2]. Yet it is remarkably difficult to infer group membership in migrating animals without being able to directly observe them. Here, we use novel lightweight atmospheric pressure loggers to monitor group dynamics in a small migratory bird, the European bee-eater (Merops apiaster). We present the first evidence of a migratory bird flying together with non-kin of different ages and sexes at all stages of the life cycle. In fact, 49% stay together throughout the annual cycle, never separating longer than 5 days at a time despite the ∼14,000-km journey. Of those that separated for longer, 89% reunited within less than a month with individuals they had previously spent time with, having flown up to 5,000 km apart. These birds were not only using the same non-breeding sites, but also displayed coordinated foraging behaviors-these are unlikely to result from chance encounters in response to the same environmental conditions alone. Better understanding of migratory group dynamics, using the presented methods, could help improve our understanding of collective decision making during large-scale movements.

[1]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Fission-fusion dynamics over large distances in raven non-breeders , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  M. Schulze,et al.  Strong cascading effect of weather conditions on prey availability and annual breeding performance in European bee-eaters Merops apiaster , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[3]  J. Krebs,et al.  Helpers-at-the-nest in European Bee-eaters ( Merops apiaster ): a Genetic Analysis , 1991 .

[4]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Timing and flight mode of departure in migrating European bee-eaters in relation to multi-scale meteorological processes , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  R. O’Hara,et al.  Experience drives innovation of new migration patterns of whooping cranes in response to global change , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  T. A. Langen Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds , 2000 .

[8]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Migration by soaring or flapping: numerical atmospheric simulations reveal that turbulence kinetic energy dictates bee-eater flight mode , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Thermoregulatory Behavior in Migratory European Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster) , 2010 .

[10]  M. Speekenbrink,et al.  depmixS4: An R Package for Hidden Markov Models , 2010 .

[11]  S. Kossenko,et al.  Competition and coexistence of the European Bee-eater Merops apiaster and the Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus in Asia , 2008 .

[12]  P. Galeotti,et al.  Estimating predation impact on honeybees Apis mellifera L. by European bee-eaters Merops apiaster L. , 2001 .

[13]  Simeon Lisovski,et al.  GeoLight – processing and analysing light‐based geolocator data in R , 2012 .

[14]  Gerald Kerth,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Sociality in Bats , 2008 .

[15]  W. Getz,et al.  Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta africana , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Adult vultures outperform juveniles in challenging thermal soaring conditions , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Idris A. Eckley,et al.  changepoint: An R Package for Changepoint Analysis , 2014 .

[18]  Michael Muthukrishna,et al.  The social and cultural roots of whale and dolphin brains , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[19]  Robert B O'Hara,et al.  Social Learning of Migratory Performance , 2013, Science.

[20]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Information transfer in moving animal groups , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[21]  J. Krause,et al.  Personality in the context of social networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Simeon Lisovski,et al.  Geolocation by light: accuracy and precision affected by environmental factors , 2012 .

[23]  F. Lei,et al.  Population genetic structure and long-distance dispersal of a recently expanding migratory bird. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[24]  A. Savage,et al.  Tracking mated pairs in a long-distance migratory songbird: migration schedules are not synchronized within pairs , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  From local collective behavior to global migratory patterns in white storks , 2018, Science.

[26]  F. A. Urquhart,et al.  Autumnal migration routes of the eastern population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus L.; Danaidae; Lepidoptera) in North America to the overwintering site in the Neovolcanic Plateau of Mexico , 1978 .

[27]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Collective decision‐making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[28]  Barbara A. Han,et al.  Animal Migration and Infectious Disease Risk , 2011, Science.

[29]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Synchronization, coordination and collective sensing during thermalling flight of freely migrating white storks , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  D. Biro,et al.  Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups , 2017, Nature Communications.

[31]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. , 2009 .

[32]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  T. Caro,et al.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals , 2006 .

[34]  Alison J. Stattersfield,et al.  Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world's major flyways , 2008, Bird Conservation International.

[35]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  K. Kotrschal,et al.  Spatial proximity among adult siblings in greylag geese (Anser anser): evidence for female bonding? , 2001, acta ethologica.

[37]  K. Kotrschal,et al.  Benefits of family reunions: Social support in secondary greylag goose families , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[38]  M. Chase,et al.  A newly discovered wildlife migration in Namibia and Botswana is the longest in Africa , 2014, Oryx.

[39]  D. Campobello,et al.  Information transfer determined by association of neighbours in European bee-eater (Merops apiaster) colonies , 2007 .

[40]  Stephen Hailes,et al.  Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight , 2014, Nature.

[41]  Albert B. Kao,et al.  Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  J. Hopcraft,et al.  Competition, predation, and migration: Individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models , 2014 .

[43]  K. M. Schaefer,et al.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean , 2011, Nature.

[44]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  The importance of fission–fusion social group dynamics in birds , 2014 .

[45]  J. Myers Space, time and the pattern of individual associations in a group-living species: Sanderlings have no friends , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.