Impact of paint and wall-paper on mould growth on plasterboards and aluminum

Abstract Biocide-free and biocide-treated plasterboards as well as aluminum plate as a reference material normally considered as being insensitive to mould growth have been used as substrate to check the influence of different common wall coverings, i.e. paints and wall papers, on fungal growth. The results described in this paper show that any non-biodegradable material (such as aluminum) can become a substrate to fungal infestation once painted or wall paper applied, depending on the type of paint or wall paper used. Moreover, a biodegradable material treated with a biocide (biocide-treated plasterboard) offers partial resistance to fungal growth at a biodegradable surface covering. The main conclusion of this study is that composition of the surface covering applied on building materials is as important as the substrate itself when considering the bioreceptivity of this material to potential fungal infestation. Accordingly, any discussion on the ability of a given building material to resist or not to fungal infestation must refer to the exact composition of the surface covering (paint, varnish, wall paper, etc). This has not often been the case in many of the previous studies published on the topic.

[1]  J. D. Cooley,et al.  Evaluation of fungal growth on cellulose-containing and inorganic ceiling tile , 2001, Mycopathologia.

[2]  Anne Hyvärinen,et al.  Fungi and actinobacteria in moisture-damaged building materials — concentrations and diversity , 2002 .

[3]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Production of mycotoxins on artificially inoculated building materials , 1998 .

[4]  Christine C. Gaylarde,et al.  Susceptibility of phosphogypsum to fungal growth and the effect of various biocides , 2002 .

[5]  B. Flannigan,et al.  Mould in buildings: the air spora of domestic dwellings , 1988 .

[6]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Determination of ergosterol on mouldy building materials using isotope dilution and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  M. Menetrez,et al.  Testing Antimicrobial Paint Efficacy on Gypsum Wallboard Contaminated with Stachybotrys chartarum , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  T. Meklin,et al.  Indoor air microbes and respiratory symptoms of children in moisture damaged and reference schools. , 2002, Indoor air.

[9]  G. Holm,et al.  Growth of moulds on building materials under different humidities , 2000 .

[10]  Michael Krause,et al.  Controlled Study of Mold Growth and Cleaning Procedure on Treated and Untreated Wet Gypsum Wallboard in an Indoor Environment , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  A. F. Bravery,et al.  The moisture requirements of moulds isolated from domestic dwellings , 1989 .

[12]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Microfungal contamination of damp buildings--examples of risk constructions and risk materials. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Production of trichothecene mycotoxins on water damaged gypsum boards in Danish buildings , 1998 .

[14]  B. Gutarowska,et al.  Elaboration and application of mathematical model for estimation of mould contamination of some building materials based on ergosterol content determination , 2002 .

[15]  P. A. Nielsen,et al.  Production of mycotoxins on artificially and naturally infested building materials , 2004, Mycopathologia.

[16]  L. Newman,et al.  Aerosolized sodium hypochlorite inhibits viability and allergenicity of mold on building materials. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.