Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] John H. Lewis,et al. Crystal Structures of a Complexed and Peptide-Free Membrane Protein–Binding Domain: Molecular Basis of Peptide Recognition by PDZ , 1996, Cell.
[2] Scott H. Soderling,et al. Peptide Array X-Linking (PAX): A New Peptide-Protein Identification Approach , 2012, PloS one.
[3] Reed B. Jacob,et al. High-Throughput Virtual Screening Molecular Docking Software for Students and Educators , 2018 .
[4] Nir London,et al. Sub‐angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins , 2010, Proteins.
[5] Arthur J. Olson,et al. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[6] Yuzuru Husimi,et al. Toward the fast blind docking of a peptide to a target protein by using a four-body statistical pseudo-potential , 2010, Comput. Biol. Chem..
[7] D. van der Spoel,et al. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[8] Kevin M. D'Auria,et al. Structural and dynamic determinants of protein-peptide recognition. , 2011, Structure.
[9] R. Hegde,et al. The surprising complexity of signal sequences. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[10] Jens Meiler,et al. Towards Ligand Docking Including Explicit Interface Water Molecules , 2013, PloS one.
[11] Jacques Schrenzel,et al. A de novo‐designed antimicrobial peptide with activity against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus acting on RsbW kinase , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[12] Max W. Chang,et al. Virtual Screening for HIV Protease Inhibitors: A Comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina , 2010, PloS one.
[13] Xiaohua Zhang,et al. Message passing interface and multithreading hybrid for parallel molecular docking of large databases on petascale high performance computing machines , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..
[14] Dima Kozakov,et al. Detection of peptide‐binding sites on protein surfaces: The first step toward the modeling and targeting of peptide‐mediated interactions , 2013, Proteins.
[15] Emil Alexov,et al. The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding. , 2013, Current pharmaceutical design.
[16] Hermann Schindelin,et al. Studies on peptide:N-glycanase–p97 interaction suggest that p97 phosphorylation modulates endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] Csaba Hetényi,et al. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[18] Nir London,et al. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. , 2010, Structure.
[19] Pierre Tufféry,et al. PEP-SiteFinder: a tool for the blind identification of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..
[20] Chee Keong Kwoh,et al. QuickVina: Accelerating AutoDock Vina Using Gradient-Based Heuristics for Global Optimization , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.
[21] Andrew J. Wilson,et al. Inhibition of α-helix-mediated protein-protein interactions using designed molecules. , 2013, Nature chemistry.
[22] David S. Goodsell,et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[23] Ruben Abagyan,et al. PeptiSite: a structural database of peptide binding sites in 4D. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[24] J. Richardson,et al. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] D. Craik,et al. The Future of Peptide‐based Drugs , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.
[26] J. Fox. Antimicrobial peptides stage a comeback , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.
[27] Nir London,et al. Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: Simultaneous Folding, Docking and Refinement of Peptides onto Their Receptors , 2011, PloS one.
[28] Iris Antes,et al. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics‐based algorithm for protein–peptide docking including receptor flexibility , 2010, Proteins.
[29] Joseph Audie,et al. Advances in the Prediction of Protein–Peptide Binding Affinities: Implications for Peptide‐Based Drug Discovery , 2013, Chemical biology & drug design.
[30] Thomas Earnest,et al. Structural basis for recognition of acidic-cluster dileucine sequence by GGA1 , 2002, Nature.
[31] Joseph Audie,et al. Recent work in the development and application of protein-peptide docking. , 2012, Future medicinal chemistry.
[32] L. Kavraki,et al. DINC: A new AutoDock-based protocol for docking large ligands , 2013, BMC Structural Biology.
[33] S. Boddu,et al. Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.
[34] M. Khrestchatisky,et al. Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. , 2010, Drug discovery today.
[35] David Neuhaus,et al. Solution NMR study of the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[36] Joost Schymkowitz,et al. Protein-peptide complex prediction through fragment interaction patterns. , 2013, Structure.
[37] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. NNScore 2.0: A Neural-Network Receptor–Ligand Scoring Function , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[38] Bingding Huang,et al. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction. , 2009, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.
[39] Joseph A. Rothnagel,et al. Emerging evidence for functional peptides encoded by short open reading frames , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[40] Aidan Budd,et al. Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.
[41] D. R. Holland,et al. Structural analysis of zinc substitutions in the active site of thermolysin , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[42] Antonio Quesada,et al. Oligopeptides as Biomarkers of Cyanobacterial Subpopulations. Toward an Understanding of Their Biological Role , 2014, Toxins.
[43] J Andrew McCammon,et al. AutoGrow 3.0: an improved algorithm for chemically tractable, semi-automated protein inhibitor design. , 2013, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[44] P. Arun Prasad,et al. A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling , 2008, Journal of computer-aided molecular design.
[45] Alexey Bochkarev,et al. Structural basis for molecular recognition and presentation of histone H3 By WDR5 , 2006, The EMBO journal.
[46] Gert Vriend,et al. Re-refinement from deposited X-ray data can deliver improved models for most PDB entries , 2009, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[47] María Martín,et al. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..
[48] Burak Erman,et al. VitAL: Viterbi Algorithm for de novo Peptide Design , 2010, PloS one.
[49] Robert B. Russell,et al. PepSite: prediction of peptide-binding sites from protein surfaces , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..
[50] Premendu P. Mathur,et al. PepBind: A Comprehensive Database and Computational Tool for Analysis of Protein–peptide Interactions , 2013, Genom. Proteom. Bioinform..
[51] S. Rüdiger,et al. Studying protein-protein interactions using peptide arrays. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.
[52] Austin G. Meyer,et al. PeptideBuilder: A simple Python library to generate model peptides , 2013, PeerJ.
[53] Julie Klein,et al. Identification of Urinary Peptide Biomarkers Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2014, PLoS ONE.
[54] David Ryan Koes,et al. Lessons Learned in Empirical Scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 Benchmarking Exercise , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[55] Juan Pablo Couso,et al. Peptides Encoded by Short ORFs Control Development and Define a New Eukaryotic Gene Family , 2007, PLoS biology.
[56] Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al. A Unified Conformational Selection and Induced Fit Approach to Protein-Peptide Docking , 2013, PloS one.
[57] G J Williams,et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.
[58] Miklos Feher,et al. Effect of Input Differences on the Results of Docking Calculations , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[59] Woody Sherman,et al. Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[60] Laura Frigotto,et al. In vitro methods for peptide display and their applications. , 2011, Briefings in functional genomics.
[61] Nir London,et al. Peptide docking and structure-based characterization of peptide binding: from knowledge to know-how. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.
[62] António J. M. Ribeiro,et al. Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium--a retrospective of 10 years in the field. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.
[63] Andrew J. Wilson,et al. Inhibition of protein-protein interactions using designed molecules. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.
[64] Alexander M. Spokoyny,et al. Rapid Flow‐Based Peptide Synthesis , 2014, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[65] Xavier Barril,et al. rDock: A Fast, Versatile and Open Source Program for Docking Ligands to Proteins and Nucleic Acids , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[66] David Baker,et al. Recapitulation and design of protein binding peptide structures and sequences. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.
[67] Paul Labute,et al. Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.